The HT-40 was also offered in a kit version called the HT-40K.
Pete, wa2cwa
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:49:37 -0800 "Bob Macklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> These two transmitters are very similar. They both use a 6DQ5 as the
> final
> and both are screen modulated.
>
> To me the T-60 looks like a
o: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Knight T-60/Hallicrafters HT-40?
> Both are crystal control. But, the HT-40 has a little more carrier power
than the T-60. It also uses a 6DQ5 sweep tube for the fin
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Knight T-60/Hallicrafters HT-40?
> The Knight T-60 is screen modulated and very low power
> in AM mode. Avoid it if possible. The transm
Both are crystal control. But, the HT-40 has a little more carrier power than
the T-60. It also uses a 6DQ5 sweep tube for the final, instead of the 6DQ6B
sweep tube the T-60 uses. Both use controlled carrier screen modulation.
73,
Ellen - AF9J
Bob Macklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Knight T-60 is screen modulated and very low power
in AM mode. Avoid it if possible. The transmit audio
isn't very good unmodified (i.e. horrible). I would
not recommend buying one to use on AM if you don't
already have one. The T-60 was made as a CW novice
station that advertised AM; which a N
How does a Knight T-60 transmitter compare toa Hillcrafters HT-40? They look
very similar.
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
"Real Radios Glow in the Dark"
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must rea
6 matches
Mail list logo
