Re: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread rbethman
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff/W5OMR Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 9:38 AM To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I'm seeing the "squished" left

RE: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread Rick Brashear
Bob, Sometimes it's all crunched to the left and sometimes it's not. I just assumed it was because you were operating from different computers, set up differently. It happens with other folks too. Rick I have no idea Terry. No one has ever said anything. I think that my e mail is set up properl

Re: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
Bob Peters wrote: Ok Guys it is fixed I hope now. It was set for 30 Charectors and Now set for 72 ...Hope that all have it better...Jim W5JO told me How to fix my outlook... -much- better -- Driving your AM Rig without a scope, is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KY

RE: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread Bob Peters
01, 2007 9:38 AM To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > FWIW, > > I'm seeing the "squished" left mail also. But only with the AM > reflector. Others are normal to my QTH

Re: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I'm seeing the "squished" left mail also. But only with the AM reflector. Others are normal to my QTH. I only see it on Bob's posts. -- Driving your AM Rig without a scope, is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV) -- 73 = Best Regar

Re: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread Geoff/W5OMR
sent back is not that way... Bob W1PE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] n.qth.net] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:20 PM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112 Dear Bob P,

RE: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread Greg Schultz Sr
PROTECTED] n.qth.net] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:20 PM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112 Dear Bob P, Hi. Just a silly question. From a newbie. Do your posts always look like the one below? Makes them very ha

Re: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread cemilton
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] n.qth.net] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:20 PM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112 Dear Bob P, Hi. Just a silly question. From a newbie. Do your posts always look like

RE: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-12-01 Thread Bob Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:20 PM To: amradio@mailman.qth.net Subject: [AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112 Dear Bob P, Hi. Just a silly question. From a newbie. Do your posts always look like the one below? Makes them very hard to read, y'know. Maybe i

[AMRadio] Re: AMRadio Digest, Vol 46, Issue 112

2007-11-30 Thread Zengmeiste
Dear Bob P, Hi. Just a silly question. From a newbie. Do your posts always look like the one below? Makes them very hard to read, y'know. Maybe it's a setting on yer email that is goofy, maybe it's southwestern bell that's being looney. either way it's really tough to read this squish-ed lefth