Mark,
How would you support the transformer with wood?
Remove it? Wood inside the case? Above or below
tranformer?
Tnx
Ken WB8EQO
--- W1EOF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As people have stated, it's a combination of both.
> People cared more about
> their work back then and probably took bette
No, but I'm working my way around to that...
I have shipped stuff in empty DEPENDS boxes if that
counts.
73, Don M.
--- Larry Taft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don,
>
> You that old that you wear diapers again? Seniors?
>
> 73, Larry K2LT
>
> Don Merz wrote:
> > Well, I once shipped a Heath
Don,
You that old that you wear diapers again? Seniors?
73, Larry K2LT
Don Merz wrote:
Well, I once shipped a Heathkit Mohawk to a guy. When
it arrived, he found a used plastic diaper among the
packing!
That's as close as I've gotten to accidentally
shipping a kid in with a radio...
73
Back in the 50's and 60's almost nothing was shipped by air --
certainly nothing as heavy as a Johnson Valiant or a Heath Apache.
But I have had a Valiant shipped to me, and it cost me nothing! My
friend constructed a wooden frame to hold the rig inside of a very
large cardboard box. Ther
Egads! Pieter, you name is surely on the watch list
now! LOL ;>)
--- Pieter Gerlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to some of the good ideas on how to and
> what to use to pack valuable pieces of equipment i
> want to relate my latest experiemce. It doesn't
> really matter what is used
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Bob Peters wrote:
Well I can tell ya all one big thing here ...Don Merz knows how to pack
gear...
Speaking as someone who has, over the last decade or so, bought much,
much gear from Don - I can verify this. My R-390A and Johnson Valiant, a
bunch of various test g
he bottom of
> the box...
>
> Bob W1PE
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Don Merz
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 2:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of AM Radio
> Subject: RE: [AMRa
...
Bob W1PE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Merz
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Packaging Radio Gear
"People don't care about their work" is cer
"People don't care about their work" is certainly a
factor. They are returning the feeling they are
getting from their employer--sometimes in spades.
But to be complete, uncaring workers are probably not
the main factor at work (pun) here.
The biggest factor is probably the sheer volume of
ship
As people have stated, it's a combination of both. People cared more about
their work back then and probably took better care in how they handled
stuff. There was less pressure to "just get the stuff outta here" than now
I'm sure.
Secondly it does not matter whether so much whether you use a part
> It would seem that the reason our "boatanchors" are damaged
> in shipment is either
(1) the manner in which these heavy radios
> are packaged or
(2) how the shipper handles the package -
> perhaps, a little of both.
It's certainly some of both, but in my experience MUCH more about (1) tha
OOOPS Geoff already said it HI>>...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W5OMR/Geoff
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:28 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Packaging Radio Gear
david knepper wrote:
> Could someon
Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Packaging Radio Gear
Could someone explain to me how radios were shipped back in the 50's so
that
they arrived at the dealers with no apparent damage. I wonder what the
original packing was back then?
With all the thousands of expensive solid-state transceivers,
david knepper wrote:
Could someone explain to me how radios were shipped back in the 50's
so that they arrived at the dealers with no apparent damage. I wonder
what the original packing was back then?
You mean back in the days when people actually took pride in their work?
--
Driving your
14 matches
Mail list logo
