RE: [AMRadio] Re: [Boatanchors] 1625 tube, 807, 837

2004-10-10 Thread Donald Chester
The 837 WAS an option with that amplifier. I recall a friend of mine bought one of those amps to run AM. He planned to drive it with an Eico 720, plate modulated. Not understanding the principles of low-level modulation, he thought he could amplify the 40 watts or so output from the Eico to

Re: [AMRadio] Re: [Boatanchors] 1625 tube, 807, 837

2004-10-10 Thread Cory Hine
The 807's are now $15... just had to replace 2 in the Viking transmitter   Cory/AD5QP Mark Foltarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Interesting information! I learned something new. It seems as though there are still plenty of the 807s around while the 837 is a little more scarce. Think I'll keep t

Re: [AMRadio] Re: [Boatanchors] 1625 tube, 807, 837

2004-10-10 Thread Mark Foltarz
Interesting information! I learned something new. It seems as though there are still plenty of the 807s around while the 837 is a little more scarce. Think I'll keep the dozen or so I have as spares for the art13s and the TBW xmtr here. de KA4JVY Mark --- Brian Carling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [AMRadio] Re: [Boatanchors] 1625 tube, 807, 837

2004-10-10 Thread Brian Carling
Don't believe the specs on the 837. I had one of those P&H linears with four 837s and two 816s. They will put out plenty of power. It was rated for 800W p.e.p. input and would do it. Don't try that with 807s. Oh you could... I am just saying that the 837 is a very decent power tube! On 9 Oct 200