[amsat-bb] T7H

2009-05-18 Thread Justin Pinnix
Patrick, Are you working the sats with a single T7H? If so, how are you getting it to uplink and downlink on different bands? I really love my T7H for repeater and simplex work. For sats, I currently only use it for RX and use a 2M mobile for TX. I'd love to consolidate to a more portable setu

[amsat-bb] Portable QSLs

2009-06-02 Thread Justin Pinnix
If you are operating away from home and want to send out QSL cards, is it acceptable to use your "home" card and note corrections to the location? Can I just put "portable FM17" in the notes field? Should I strike through my home grid? 73 AJ4MJ/P FM25 (15 May - 17 May 2009) AJ4MJ/P FM07 (30 May

[amsat-bb] Re: Other Sat ants

2009-06-05 Thread Justin Pinnix
How hard is it to reproduce the Elk in a homebrew? It's a log perioidic and all of the "build your own" articles I've found on the web are for yagis. Are the log periodic's dimensions more critical? What about building a pair of yagis ( http://www.wa5vjb.com/references/Cheap%20Antennas-LEOs.pdf) a

[amsat-bb] Re: DJ-G7T programming cable question

2009-06-09 Thread Justin Pinnix
Well, there's a guy on eHam who responds to every question with "that's a stupid question" or "go look it up". That just doubles the amount of noise :-) I'm all for experimenting as well, but randomly plugging unknown devices together is a good way to blow something up. What if the programming c

[amsat-bb] Re: Request cross test of satellite prediction. Thanks

2009-06-11 Thread Justin Pinnix
Joe, I used the AMSAT web site to check your numbers ( http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/tools/predict/). Enter the coordinates you gave and choose "next 30 passes" or so to look ahead into the future. The first passes of the day seem to be within +- 1 minute of your predictions for 50, 51, 27, and

[amsat-bb] Re: New Satellites

2009-06-11 Thread Justin Pinnix
Here is most of the info you are looking for: http://amsat.org/pipermail/amsat-bb/2009-February/017391.html On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Vincenzo Mone wrote: > Hi folks, > is it possible to know the Downlink and if any uplink frequencies and modes > for these new birds: > > TACSAT-3 > PHARM

[amsat-bb] Re: qsl card

2009-07-01 Thread Justin Pinnix
After working Simonyi in February, I sent my QSL card off to ARRL HQ and got an NA1SS card back within several weeks. 73 de AJ4MJ On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Greg D. wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > Now you've got me wondering... I sent mine off to the normal ARISS QSL > site, and got a somewhat dis

[amsat-bb] Re: Iss repeater or crossband.

2011-05-09 Thread Justin Pinnix
Kev, I believe the decision is made by the ISS crew. This website tracks the current status and may give clues to upcoming events: http://www.issfanclub.com/ I believe that most of the time the station works in digipeater mode. I have been experimenting with using this over the past couple of w

[amsat-bb] Re: AO-51

2011-05-12 Thread Justin Pinnix
Kevin, Congrats on your first contacts! I built a handle for the Elk out of PVC pipe. It's long enough (about 4 feet) so that I can rest one end of it on my hip to carry most of the weight. The passes are only 10 minutes or so, so my arm doesn't get too tired with the rest of the weight. I cal

[amsat-bb] Re: IC9100 and SATPC32

2011-05-13 Thread Justin Pinnix
One could always buy an 857D and an 817 to get full-duplex all mode. Yaesu should offer the two as a package and call it the 1674 :-) On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dee wrote: > I think the Chinese radios will come out with a Satellite Radio- ALL Mode > DC to Daylight for about $750. Somethi

[amsat-bb] Re: Fm satellite Frequencies and Doppler

2011-05-16 Thread Justin Pinnix
Hi Kev, The active FM birds are AO-51, SO-50, AO-27, and ISS. I think SO-67 and HO-68 are sometimes available. I'm sure someone will correct me if I have omitted any. You can get their frequencies by clicking on each one on this page: http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/satellites/status.php The do

[amsat-bb] Re: My First Satellite Contacts

2011-05-19 Thread Justin Pinnix
On a related note, I saw a FAQ that indicated that LOTW does not accept ISS contacts. Is that still the case? Seems kinda strange. On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Ted wrote: > Ben, > > 1. if you use HRD Logbook, you need to input the satellite name and > indicate > 'propagation' as 'satellite

[amsat-bb] Re: My First Satellite Contacts

2011-05-19 Thread Justin Pinnix
To clarify, I was referring to contacts relayed via ISS either through the digipeater or the voice repeater. On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Justin Pinnix wrote: > On a related note, I saw a FAQ that indicated that LOTW does not accept ISS > contacts. Is that still the case? Seems

[amsat-bb] Re: ISS to be reboosted June 3rd

2011-05-31 Thread Justin Pinnix
Do you think that if we asked real, real, nicely they'd go boost AO-51 for us while they're up there? :-) Just kidding - I know the reasons why this could never realistically be done. But it does give me a great deal of appreciation for how reliable a satellite can be when someone else is doing

[amsat-bb] Re: PSK v. APRS

2011-06-06 Thread Justin Pinnix
Greg, you're overlooking something - the time dimension. Yes, packet is a one-at-a-time affair, but those packets move quickly - 1200bps vs 31bps for PSK31. So, each station only has the bird tied up for a short period of time. You could think of it as a form of time division multiplexing. 73 de

[amsat-bb] Re: PSK v. APRS

2011-06-07 Thread Justin Pinnix
A packet satellite can also be operated simplex (TX and RX on the same frequency). That means a single antenna and no diplexer for both the bird and ground station equipment. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Trevor . wrote: > Hi Bob, > > I accept what you are saying about burst mode but it's pos

[amsat-bb] Re: PSK v. APRS

2011-06-07 Thread Justin Pinnix
Guess I learned the ITU version :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplex_communication On Tuesday, June 7, 2011, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote: > That's half duplex, not simplex. > > On 07-Jun-11 14:55, Justin Pinnix wrote: > > A packet satellite can also be operated simpl