Zack,
Any solution could have benefits, depending on your needs.  These antennas 
would be very stealthy, if deed restrictions are an issue.  Also, they are 
simple (as all omnidirectional antenna) and you would not have to worry about 
tracking (rotors, software, PC interfaces, etc.).
 
>From a cost perspective, you could buy a brand new TV rotor, an Arrow or Elk 
>(user's choice, or any similar-gain pair of antennas), and a AAR/SSB/Mirage 
>preamp for less and have a system far superior (~6 dB) in both uplink and 
>downlink capability.  Besides just the obvious gain benefit, directional 
>antennas also noticeably reduce local noise/IM exacerbated by a preamp--thus 
>your S/N ratio is also improved dramatically.  

If you do want to go with an omni solution, I concur with Mark's suggestion a 
pair of Tony's parasitic Lindenblad's and a separate RF-sensed preamp would be 
a good choice.  You could build a pair in an afternoon for about $25 in parts 
and find a used preamp for $75 or so.  
 
UO-14 and SO-35 you could hear easily with an omni antenna.  AO-27 you can't.  
FO-20 was easy to hear, FO-29 not quite so loud.  AO-51 when at high power you 
can hear above 25 degrees with an omni and good preamp, but you will be 
frustrated by the short pass time available (and when it is set to lower output 
power).  The bottom line is there are no truly "easy-sats" in 2011 and omni 
antennas are a real compromise that makes operating with them only attractive 
if there is a good reason you cannot use directioinal antennas.  I'll give you 
a personal example:  after moving back to Texas late last year I wanted to get 
back on the birds, so I "threw" up an old omin antenna (Eggbeater II from a 
long, long time ago) and put a Landwehr preamp in the attic (it was easy and 
fast).  See my comment above about being frustrated--I didn't operate much.  
When ND9M was at sea I got really frustrated!  So I swapped out the Egg II with 
a slightly-less old antenna, a TPM II and pointed it due !
 West (fixed, no rotor) and worked Jim a few times, mostly on FO-29, when he 
was in the Pacific Ocean.  After he went through the Panama Canal, I went back 
on the roof and pointed the antenna to the SE and worked him a few more times 
in the Carrib and GoM.  I worked him in 9 grids, but was not able to work much 
else.  Last weekend I finally made the time to run the cables through the house 
walls for the rotor and quickly built up a small homebrew beam for 70 cm (3x3), 
installed a coaxial relay for polarity switching, and moved the preamp to just 
below the antenna:  a world of difference, as you can imagine.  Solid copy on 
all those birds now.  Sorry for the long story, but my recommendation is borne 
out of experience--only use the omni if you can't use a beam.

73,
Jerry, K5OE
 
--- original message ---
Interesting, Zack.

I would ask them about transmitting through the one with the preamp built in.  
Can you do it? (i.e., is it RF-sensed/switched) 

Or does the preamp make it a "receive only" antenna, with the accidental 
transmission through it smoking the device :)  It's bound to happen on a dual 
band radio...

(I think you'd be better off building a pair of AA2TX style Lindenblads...)

Mark N8MH 

At 12:01 PM 4/25/2011 +0000, vtnn...@comcast.net wrote:


>Antennas.us is selling a combo package of 2M and 70cm quadrifilar helix 
>antennas and a bias tee for $330.00. The 70cm antenna has a built-in 15db LNA 
>BTW. 
>
>http://www.antennas.us/store/p/391-UC-AMSAT-KIT-2-m-70-cm-Amateur-Satellite-Antenna-Kit.html
> 
>
>The UC-AMSAT-KIT, 2 m / 70 cm Amateur Satellite Antenna Kit is a discounted 
>bundle combination of quantity 1 each of the following three antenna products: 
>UC-1464-433, VHF Amateur Satellite QFH Antenna, Passive 
>UC-4364-513, UHF Amateur Satellite QFH Antenna, with built-in LNA and SMA Male 
>connector 
>BIT-1500-385, UHF Bias Tee 
>
>I was wondering though what some of you on the list think of these antennas 
>for FM LEO users that are looking for fixed outdoor antennas? 
>
>
>73 
>Zack 
>N8FNR 





_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to