[amsat-bb] Re: DJ-G7 for LEO

2011-04-27 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi Bill! > Is it just de-sense, or lower sensitivity on the sub-band? I have one on > loan I am going to try (A-B compare to my FT-530 with the Arrow), as soon as > I find a SMA-BNC adapter in my shack. Actually, it's both. There is very noticeable desense, and the sub-band VFO is less sensitive

[amsat-bb] Re: DJ-G7 for LEO

2011-04-27 Thread Clint Bradford
> ... I read the QST review and the author said "no issue" ... QST's reviewers disappointed me with that mis-statement, as well as recently calling the Wouxun HTs "dual-receive" units - which they most definitely are NOT. Clint, K6LCS ___ Sent via AM

[amsat-bb] Re: DJ-G7 for LEO

2011-04-27 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
derful sub-band tune feature. I don't recall specifics, but I remember thinking the QST review really missed the boat on the G7. 73, Drew KO4MA -Original Message- >From: Bill W1PA >Sent: Apr 27, 2011 8:40 AM >To: "AMSAT-BB@amsat.org" >Subject: [amsat-bb] Re:

[amsat-bb] Re: DJ-G7 for LEO

2011-04-27 Thread Bill W1PA
Drew, Is it just de-sense, or lower sensitivity on the sub-band? I have one on loan I am going to try (A-B compare to my FT-530 with the Arrow), as soon as I find a SMA-BNC adapter in my shack. I read the QST review and the author said "no issue" except for same-band sub-band, but he is not an

[amsat-bb] Re: DJ-G7 for LEO

2011-04-23 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
Big thumbs down, as the full duplex desenses very badly. Nice radio otherwise, but stinks for satellite. I bought one of the first hundred, and have kept up with the firmware updates. 73, Drew KO4MA -Original Message- >From: Bill Acito >Sent: Apr 23, 2011 9:27 AM >To: "AMSAT-BB@amsat.