I don't see why Hams couldn't be involved in the design of the communications
for the probe...
On Nov 5, 2011, at 11:11 AM, R Oler orbit...@hotmail.com wrote:
I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
transportation)..transportation should obviously be communication.
At 09:11 AM 11/5/2011, R Oler wrote:
I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
transportation)..transportation should obviously be communication.
the reality of a lunar transponder (or even a packet system) would
be that it would encourage a lot of things that the FM sats
- Original Message -
From: R Oler orbit...@hotmail.com
To: w7...@comcast.net
Cc: Amsat BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 6:11 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ESA lunar probe
I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
transportation)..transportation
Just for the sake of conversation and thinking. What would the link budget
look like for a transponder on the moon.
Bob W7LRD
- Original Message -
From: R Oler orbit...@hotmail.com
To: Amsat BB amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2011 4:10:00 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb]
I wrote: (and the time delay makes it well a unique form of
transportation)..transportation should obviously be communication.
the reality of a lunar transponder (or even a packet system) would be that it
would encourage a lot of things that the FM sats do not...and discourage a lot
of bad
Bob...its been done here a zillion times...it wont be done with an HT and a
small yagi...it will however be possible whereas a Mars effort is really not
possible for anyone except Goldstone class stations (and the time delay makes
it well a unique form of transportation). A small linear
