[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 Status

2010-02-03 Thread jp-byj-free
Hi .. I made 2 qso yesterday evening… good conditions with 10w Uplink and Yagi 9elm This evening heard CW beacon F0-29 100203-1913utc Europe HI HI 20 02 88 D5 00 84 00 00 09 60 01 01 6B 4A 8C 8A 97 64 94 92 93 94 92 HI HI 20 02 88 D5 00 84 00 00 09 60 01 01 6E 49 92 90 9D 74 95 93 94 94 93

[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 Status

2010-02-03 Thread PE0SAT
Hi All, I experience the same, great signal during the whole pass. One remark and I don't no if others experience the same. I use SatPC32 and during the begining of the pass I have to correct the uplink freq for about 300hz and at the end it is 0hz again. I am puzzled because FO-29 is the only

[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 Status

2010-10-23 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
> > > > The AMSAT web page says that she is operational but I cannot find a > schedule. > > > She has been off for about a week, and I haven't seen a clear long term prognosis. I'll add something to the status page today. 73, Drew KO4MA ___ Sent

[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 status?

2010-10-31 Thread Yutaka Murata
Hi Drew JARL command team tried to activate the transponder on 10/29 20:20 (UTC) 10/30 07:33(UTC) 10/30 19:18(UTC). So far no reply from her. It is not good news. Hope she will back soon. 73 Yutaka Murata JA1COU (2010/10/31 23:38), Andrew Glasbrenner wrote: > I'm really missing FO-29. Do any o

[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 status 28Aug2009

2009-08-28 Thread Gary "Joe" Mayfield
Hurray! --- Three cheers for our Japanese friends! -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Mineo Wakita Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 7:46 AM To: r...@optonline.net Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-29 status 28Aug200

[amsat-bb] Re: FO-29 status now

2010-10-24 Thread PE0SAT
On Sun, October 24, 2010 04:03, Mineo Wakita wrote: Hi Mineo, > The strenuous repair work continues every day by a control station > to return in FO-29 transponder. JARL grand station says that the > command was not able to transmit even a pass of 18:46 UTC, 23 Oct, > so we will try again the tr