6, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Rich/wa4bue richard.s...@verizon.net wrote:
Will there be a video available on the AMSAT forum after Dayton?
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Buxton am...@n0jy.org
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 11:52 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Fox-1
Hi Nick,
You did not miss anything, the information you read in the Journal is as
new to you as it is to us. It was learned at the time Barry was writing
his Apogee View in March but due to Tony's illness and passing the
Journal issue was delayed a week or two in order to include the
Will there be a video available on the AMSAT forum after Dayton?
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Buxton am...@n0jy.org
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 11:52 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Fox-1 launch delay
Hi Nick,
You did not miss anything, the information you
My thoughts regarding the two launch possibilities:
I hope that, if given the choice, that AMSAT sticks with ELaNa-12. The
11 year orbit and 780 km apogee is much better than an apogee in the
600 km range and a 6.5 year orbital life. Given that Fox-1 is the
first amateur satellite designed for
Given that Fox-1 is the first amateur satellite designed for it's batteries
to eventually die,
we should give it the opportunity!
I know I'm being picky here but it's the first FM voice CubeSat to be designed
for operation after battery failure. DO-64 (Delfi-C3) has always been operating
One hard and fast rule in the space launch industry:
Everyone remembers a launch failure, no one will remember a launch delay.
Delays suck, it's a hell of a lot better than blowing up. The launch
industry is largely binary, you either fully succeed or fail. This is at
least the perspective of
Hi Paul,
From the Fox-1 Team, thanks for the support and well wishes. We're
working hard to fulfill everyone's expectations!
I will have additional information about the launch opportunities, at
the AMSAT forum in Dayton.
73
Jerry
N0JY
On 5/6/2014 11:19 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
My
