Thanks for the info Pieter.
73 Trevor M5AKA
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Pieter Kotze wrote:
> Intended orbit is around 500km to meet the imaging payload
> requirements. At this altitude and with the limited
> propulsion on board, 3 years is a good estimate of the
> satellite lifetime due to re-entry.
On 28 Sep 2009 at 9:52, Pieter Kotze wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:52:52 +0200
From: Pieter Kotze
Subject:[amsat-bb] Sumbandila blog
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
> For those who would like to keep up with what is happening see
Johan
I have updated the SA AMSAT web. Please keep me informed of progress
Hans
Hans van de Groenendaal
Features Editor EngineerIT
012 991 4662
082 781 4631
- Original Message -
From: "Johann Lochner"
To:
Cc: "Hans van de Groenendaal" ; "Allan Saul"
; "Ib Christoffersen" ; "Andrew
Gl
John,
Same observation here. Likewise for the central USA (1514z) pass.
John Meeks
KC8ZFN
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:54 AM, John Papay wrote:
> SO-67 was not heard over the eastern USA as
> scheduled. It could be that there was a problem
> with my receiver but it was working on the earlier
>
Dear Sumbandila Team,
Congrats and Thanks for getting SO-67 back on the air again. Will certainly
look forward to work through the Satellite again.
We fully understand the requirement for activation during Day time passes.
Since most of us here in India use simple "Fixed" antenna setups - please
Hello Jan,
Has there been any test on the telecommunication payload?
Regards,
From: sumband...@googlegroups.com [mailto:sumband...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Jan-Albert Koekemoer
Sent: 25 January 2010 01:01 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Cc: sumband...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Sumbandi
Thanks Alan
Your reports are much appreciated
73
Hans ZS6AKV
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cresswell"
To: "'Jan-Albert Koekemoer'" ;
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 12:39 AM
Subject: [Sumbandila: 127] RE: [amsat-bb] SA-AMSAT payload activation on
SO-67
>
> Excellent 19 de
