[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Gary "Joe" Mayfield
: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:51 PM To: Clint Bradford Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800 The 8800 is sweet for everything else that I use it for - repeaters, x-band repeat (handy function!), simplex, you name it, but I never seemed to have good success using it for satellite

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Ari Kosonen
2011/1/12 Ernie Howard > I have three of the FT-8800 mobiles. They work great for satellite. I have FT-8900 in my car (which is pretty much the same radio, except with 2 additional bands, 28 and 50 MHz). I am quite happy with the sensitivity of the radio, no problems hearing AO-51 and having fe

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Edward R. Cole
At 12:17 PM 1/12/2011, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote: >Hi Zack! > > > I don't mean to be the odd guy on the block, but I do not like the 8800 for > > satellite work. I enjoy the full duplex function, and it is very easy to > > maneuver through the frequencies/bands using the mic, but I do

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Ernie Howard
I have three of the FT-8800 mobiles. They work great for satellite. It is my FM radio for sat operation installed here at home. I've tried other dual band radios, but the FT-8800 is much preferred. The downside is that I too have noticed that they lack sensitivity especially on 70cm. Yes, I mea

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
; Zack > KD8KSN > > -Original Message- > From: Clint Bradford > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:19 PM > To: amsat-bb@amsat.org > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800 > > Great for sat work - like Patrick mentioned. > > For portability, I have installed

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Zachary Beougher
The 8800 is sweet for everything else that I use it for - repeaters, x-band repeat (handy function!), simplex, you name it, but I never seemed to have good success using it for satellite work. Maybe I need to pull it out again and give it another try. Like I said, I can’t make an accurate judg

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Clint Bradford
>> ... I do not like the receive sensitivity ... Hmmm ... I just didn't experience that. Does your '8800 work fine for local/repeater work? Clint, K6LCS ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA me

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Zachary Beougher
The 2 THG71As, and now the THD7A and 1 THG71A (yeah, I know the D7 is full duplex, but that is another story) are my regular satellite equipment. 73! Zack KD8KSN -Original Message- From: Clint Bradford Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:19 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-b

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT-8800

2011-01-12 Thread Clint Bradford
Great for sat work - like Patrick mentioned. For portability, I have installed mine in an ice chest ... photos at ... ttp://tinyurl.com/cooler-radios Clint Bradford, K6LCS ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not

[amsat-bb] Re: Yaesu FT 8800

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi! > Does anyone on the reflector have any experience with? the Yaesu FT8800 > for satellite operation?? Any information will be appreciated. It is a good radio for FM satellite work. You get separate knobs for volume and tuning on each VFO, so you don't have to switch between the VFOs when it