[amsat-bb] Re: more antenna discussions

2011-03-19 Thread David Reinhart
Unless you're a big-gun VHF/UHF contester that needs every last dB of antenna gain, circularly polarized sat antennas will work quite nicely for Terrestrial work. This is especially true on 70cm where the gain from a 40 element M^2 436CP like the one I have is so high that the 3dB loss is

[amsat-bb] Re: more antenna discussions....

2011-03-18 Thread Jeff Moore
Horizontally polarized beams will not work very well for satellite use. For maximum utility, I'd get crossed yagis set up to switch between horizontal, vertical, and circular polarization. Use the circular polarity to work the sats, horizontal polarity to do weak signal work, and vertical

[amsat-bb] Re: more antenna discussions....

2011-03-18 Thread wa4hfn
, but not necessary. WA4HFN Damon em55 - Original Message - From: Andrew Glasbrenner glasbren...@mindspring.com To: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 3:42:54 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: more antenna discussions On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:13 PM

[amsat-bb] Re: more antenna discussions....

2011-03-18 Thread Jim Jerzycke
+2 with what Drew says. I've been using my M2 2M7 and 420-50-11 like this for years. When I first had them on the roof at my apartment, they were on a single mast, with azimuth only rotation. I had to carefully choose my passes for low elevation so the satellite didn't rise out of the pattern,

[amsat-bb] Re: more antenna discussions....

2011-03-18 Thread i8cvs
decreases and the most part of the time in wich a LEO satellite during a pass is above 45 degrees elevation is very small. 73 de i8CVS Domenico - Original Message - From: Jeff Moore tnetcen...@gmail.com To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 9:13 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: more