[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing

2013-06-10 Thread Gary "Joe" Mayfield
ACLog. 73, Joe -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Jim Walls Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 5:25 PM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing On 6/10/2013 14:21, Patrick STODDARD (WD9

[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing

2013-06-10 Thread Gus
On 06/10/2013 06:24 PM, Jim Walls wrote: I have not been satellite active for several years (mostly because of no birds to actually talk through for more than 3 seconds at a time). Ditto. LOTW was fairly new when I stopped operating satellite, but at that time the general comment from those

[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing

2013-06-10 Thread R.T.Liddy
Jim LoTW works just fine for SAT QSO's now. As long the ADIF filefor your operations is filled-out correctly. 73/GL,    Bob K8BL --- On Mon, 6/10/13, Jim Walls wrote: From: Jim Walls Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Date: Monday, Ju

[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing

2013-06-10 Thread Paul Stoetzer
Jim, LoTW works fine as long as the ADIF fields for propagation mode and satellite are properly filled with "SAT" and the satellite abbreviation, respectively. Satellite QSOs show up properly for WAS Satellite, VUCC Satellite, and DXCC Satellite. 73, Paul, N8HM On 6/10/2013 6:24 PM, Jim Wa

[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing

2013-06-10 Thread Jim Walls
On 6/10/2013 14:21, Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) wrote (in small part): But, as N5AFV mentioned earlier, we satellite operators should file for this award. Even if all it does is show ARRL that we're out here. 73! Patrick I have not been satellite active for several years (mostly because

[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing

2013-06-10 Thread Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Hi! That sure seems like a long time. And then, to have an error occur withthe > processing and no sticker and no credit card paperwork. Not very > goodattention to detail. > It sure makes using LoTW a much better way to go. It's a whole lot > faster(often a day or two for credit) and less human i

[amsat-bb] Re: Timing on VUCC Upgrade Processing

2013-06-10 Thread R.T.Liddy
That sure seems like a long time. And then, to have an error occur withthe processing and no sticker and no credit card paperwork. Not very goodattention to detail. It sure makes using LoTW a much better way to go. It's a whole lot faster(often a day or two for credit) and less human interventio

[amsat-bb] Re: timing

2010-12-13 Thread Wayne Estes
When you launch WinAOS, you have the opportunity to specify which Keps file to use. Make sure WinAOS uses the same "Source File" as SatPC32. Wayne Estes W9AE Oakland, Oregon, USA ___ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the auth

[amsat-bb] Re: timing

2010-12-12 Thread Erich Eichmann
Hi Jack, please read the WinAOS help file that can opened with the WinAOS "Help" menu. In the SatPC32 environment WinAOS uses (by default) the same Keps file as SatPC32. So, when you update that Keps file for SatPC32 WinAOS will automatcally use the updated Keps. When you run WinAOS "stand allone