Re: [Amsn-devel] Patch with "-d" nicknames

2007-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hi, First, welcome to the list! :) Thanks for the contribution but this patch is a hack and it shouldn't be done this way. The real solution is much easier.. wherever we see : font measure $font $msg replace it with : font measure $font -displayof . $msg The problem is that '-d' is interpreted a

[Amsn-devel] Patch with "-d" nicknames

2007-12-17 Thread José Ramón Rubio Largo
Hi. My name is Jose Ramon, I'm from Spain and I'm new writing in this list, so at first hi everyone and sorry about my english!! I like amsn project and I'm reading its source code the last days... so I'll try collaborate it in my few free time. I've seen http://www.amsn-project.net/wiki/Forums_TO

Re: [Amsn-devel] Patch for cmsn_change_state

2007-12-17 Thread square87
2007/12/17, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > oh man! not again! lol, ok, I'll check your diffs, but not now, when I > wake up... > Just let me comment below... > > ok, I understand you, but you are doing it completely wrong!!! what we do > there is to SAVE the identifier of the new DP, if we

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97 TODO

2007-12-17 Thread Boris Faure (aka billiob)
Send the patch here. On Dec 17, 2007 5:48 PM, Henrique Cesar Ulbrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Historiadores acreditam que, > em Segunda 17 Dez 2007, Youness Alaoui disse: > > So, if anyone feels like coding, or wants to see 0.97 out of the door soon, > > then start fixing the bugs that appear

Re: [Amsn-devel] 0.97 TODO

2007-12-17 Thread Henrique Cesar Ulbrich
Historiadores acreditam que, em Segunda 17 Dez 2007, Youness Alaoui disse: > So, if anyone feels like coding, or wants to see 0.97 out of the door soon, > then start fixing the bugs that appear in that link, that's the best place > to go.. > Have fun! Can I have a Subversion account or should I s

Re: [Amsn-devel] Patch for cmsn_change_state

2007-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
oh man! not again! lol, ok, I'll check your diffs, but not now, when I wake up... Just let me comment below... On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 03:36:00PM +, square87 wrote: > Hi KaKaRoTo :) > > Thanks for "all of this is some very well done work" :) also my patch to add > styles and colors in topcw

[Amsn-devel] 0.97 TODO

2007-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hey, it's been up for months, but I never thought it was worth mentioning it here.. but since Square87 seems to have a lot of free time and keeps sending us patches, maybe it would be nice if the patches we receive actually fix one of the bugs we have for the 0.97 TODO... So here's a link to the

Re: [Amsn-devel] aMSN release cycle (idea)

2007-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
Yeah, noone is active, noone wants to do anything, and that sucks... And I'm tired of being the one who has to do everything or the one who needs to motivate everyone.. Thankfully, I feel like Phil is a big big help to me as he is very dedicated to the project. The 0.97 release should be done sh

Re: [Amsn-devel] aMSN release cycle (idea)

2007-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hello Square, Here's my opinion : your email is too long! :p seriously though, it feels long because it's 10h30 AM and I've been in bed for 2 hours trying to sleep and I just can't sleep, so I wanted to check my mails 'quick' before going back to bed and try to finally close my eyes... anyways,

Re: [Amsn-devel] Patch for cmsn_change_state

2007-12-17 Thread square87
Hi KaKaRoTo :) Thanks for "all of this is some very well done work" :) also my patch to add styles and colors in topcw was good :P lol Ok, now that i know what it was committed (almost all :P) i send a new diffs to correct other things. 6-1.diff So here i answer what do you asked me "why AND if

Re: [Amsn-devel] aMSN release cycle (idea)

2007-12-17 Thread Harry Vennik
Hi, This is certainly a good idea, but it can only work when the aMSN team is more active, and thus more productive. aMSN 0.97 final is getting so late just because there is nobody with enough time to make the release ready. Youness said in another mail he *maybe* has the time to do it sh

Re: [Amsn-devel] Removing useless code in protocol.tcl

2007-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
As long as you're sure it's unused code, then go ahead, protocol.tcl needs a little weight loss! ;) KaKaRoTo On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:50:37AM +, Tom Hennigan wrote: > Sounds like a good plan, I guess we can always revert any changes that > bug, and then fix them post release =] > > - T