Op woensdag 19 juli 2006 06:30, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 08:27:30AM +0200, Harry Vennik wrote:
> > Op dinsdag 18 juli 2006 02:28, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> > > Ok, thanks for the check... I did notice the OnMac/OnUnix thing, but I
> > > also saw a -padx {0 12} vs.-padx [lis
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 08:27:30AM +0200, Harry Vennik wrote:
> Op dinsdag 18 juli 2006 02:28, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> > Ok, thanks for the check... I did notice the OnMac/OnUnix thing, but I
> > also saw a -padx {0 12} vs.-padx [list 0 12] in a diff
> That has been in trunk for quite a long time
Op dinsdag 18 juli 2006 02:28, schreef Youness Alaoui:
> Ok, thanks for the check... I did notice the OnMac/OnUnix thing, but I
> also saw a -padx {0 12} vs.-padx [list 0 12] in a diff
That has been in trunk for quite a long time, and I recently ported it to the
branch ;-)
> , and that is a bug t
Ok, thanks for the check... I did notice the OnMac/OnUnix thing, but I
also saw a -padx {0 12} vs.-padx [list 0 12] in a diff, and that is a
bug that should also be applied to the branch... the diff should be
looked at line by line.. hopefully, I'll do it once I get my new PC!
about indenting, I
No panic please. We did not branch for nothing. Development is just going on
on the trunk. Also many of the changes are trivial. Remember that I did a
very big commit? It changed indenting in some places, and it changed the way
we check on which platform we are. Those changes are the most of the
Thanks harry, you just took that out of my mouth :)
merging will be useless if the diffs are in gui.tcl and the same code was
moved to contact.tcl for example...
KKRT
On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:22:56 -0400, Harry Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am reviewing everything regularly, and it app
I am reviewing everything regularly, and it appears Youness does too, so I
think we're safe! Merging at the end may not be right, because things may
grow apart while we are doing RC1, RC2 and maybe RC3, and the diff might
become too messy. Now we're still working on not much more than 0.96 TODO,
Hey,
Will we merge branches when 0.96 will be out ?
It should be the way to be sure to don't lost anything...
Phil
Le Saturday 27 May 2006 10:38, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
> Hey, I've seen some commits go in the trunk without being ported to the
> 0.96 branch and some to the 0.96 branch without bei
Fixed now.
Fred, i've fixed your commit too.
Greets
--
Boris FAURE (aka billiob)
mail, msn : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However, a large number of electrons were terribly
agitated.
___
Amsn-devel mailing lis
Hey, I've seen some commits go in the trunk without being ported to the
0.96 branch and some to the 0.96 branch without being sent to the trunk...
Billiob, you did 2 commits
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/amsn?rev=6714&view=rev and
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/amsn?rev=6715&
10 matches
Mail list logo
