cool, thx or the advice.. I knew mod_rewrite and it's used by the userwiki
(redirecting wiki/* to
w/index.php?..
this also means that it's enabled in SF servers, so we can use that!
thx
KKRT
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 03:49:54PM +0100, David Ramsden wrote:
> Boris Faure (aka billiob) wrote:
> > On
Boris Faure (aka billiob) wrote:
> On 10/8/06, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you have just to try... sending a http://amsn.net/'
>> . __FILE__') ; ?> (IIRC) may work or may not :/
>
> IIRC, the http package doesn't follow the "Location" items.
>
> I didn't reply about the best solution
> > On 10/8/06, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> you have just to try... sending a >> http://amsn.net/'
> >> . __FILE__') ; ?> (IIRC) may work or may not :/
> >
> > IIRC, the http package doesn't follow the "Location" items.
>
> reallly ? :/ that's a standard http header...
Have a look
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Faure (aka billiob)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mailing list for developers and everyone helping AMSN"
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] Hosting plans WAS : an old discussion...
> On 10/8/06,
On 10/8/06, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you have just to try... sending a http://amsn.net/'
> . __FILE__') ; ?> (IIRC) may work or may not :/
IIRC, the http package doesn't follow the "Location" items.
I didn't reply about the best solution for the serv cause i haven't
enough knowledg
- Original Message -
From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> well, my idea was to keep amsn.sourceforge.net/* redirecting automatically
> to amsn.net/* because of the static
> pages (amsn.sf.net/faq.php) and autoupdate URLs... we need it to be
> automaticly redirecting, no 'cli
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 09:31:10AM +0200, Harry Vennik wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello,
thanx for the feedback!
> I have not been able to keep up with this thread completely, but I read most
> of the mails quickly. I support the idea. About the money, I trust Youness to
> manage it, but stil want to stres
Hi,
I have not been able to keep up with this thread completely, but I read most
of the mails quickly. I support the idea. About the money, I trust Youness to
manage it, but stil want to stress that a few other people should have an eye
on it. But I think you already said that in some e-mail ea
In other words, here are the reasons for our choice :
1 - leeware, it's good, good prices but it's unmanaged, which means we have to
do everything and in case a
system crash, we need to write the guy so that he can reboot the machine.. and
we can't do it remotely...
2 - rackforce.. it doesn't gi
Well,
after a great chat with Youness we conclude that Webintellecs complies
perfectly with our requirements so after the examination of money we have
received for 4 days we think we can afford renting a VPS at Webintellecs for
40$/mo
We think to buy a domain name like amsn.* to not rely on SF f
Hi,
For me, we could go to LeeWare...
By the way, you said 500GB bandwidth but we can continue to use SF for file
releases So we could redirect users on SF mirrors
My ranking
1 - LeeWare VPS 300 : $25.00/mo
But one question remains : how do you ensure that your box will reboot if
ther
Humm.. it looks good, but isn't it "too good to be true" ? why would it be that
cheap ?
anyways, it looks interesting... don't know if we have enough information on
what they provide...
Anyways.. we'll see.. for now I want everyone's vote... got 3 answers, everyone
is sending new links but
are
cool...
I found this from one of the threads : http://vpschoice.com/
it looks like a great resource! I found this :
http://www.leeware.com/vps300.html
maybe interesting...
KKRT
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:26:28PM +0200, NoWhereMan wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Youness Alaoui"
The one mentioned here is bad : it hasn't any admin access it's only a web
server...
I propose one I found on the net :
http://www.clicserv.fr/page.php?id=cmVmPXN1aXRlJnJ1Yj0zNiZzaXRlPTE=
But be careful !!
If you go to the .com domain you will have prices in dollars and a dedicated
server is 53,3
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:37:16AM -0400, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> Ok, now is the time to start thinking about the VDS/VPS (virtual
> dedicated/private server) to
> use... there are several solutions, what I don't like is the fact that they
> rarely give you the
> number of bps speed the site wi
- Original Message -
From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip!]
if I were in you I'd ask here too http://www.webhostingtalk.com/
bye!
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.
Ok, now is the time to start thinking about the VDS/VPS (virtual
dedicated/private server) to
use... there are several solutions, what I don't like is the fact that they
rarely give you the
number of bps speed the site will have...
Ok, well, first, we need to do our math...
in november 2005,
17 matches
Mail list logo
