Thanks,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:52:34 -0500, Arieh Schneier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arieh, can you complie with the last source before releasing the 0.95
??
I don't have the required software to compile it at home, I will try
from
work tomorrow
I compiled it yesterday, although I
> > Arieh, can you complie with the last source before releasing the 0.95 ??
> I don't have the required software to compile it at home, I will try from
> work tomorrow
I compiled it yesterday, although I had to change a link setting (I think it
was to enable incremental linking or something) to g
Can you downgrade to the original one ?
If it works so yes if no so send me the new output
If you can't/don't want to downgrade do what you think.
Phil
Le Mardi 22 Novembre 2005 20:12, Sander Hoentjen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 20:02 +0100, Le Philousophe - Phil wrote:
> > ---
> > Sande
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 20:02 +0100, Le Philousophe - Phil wrote:
> ---
> Sander I don't understand the error that does your rpmbuild. It seems you
> discovered a bug in it !! "Assertion `ftype != ((void *)0)' failed."
> Try to upgrade it ? What is your distro ?
> Phil
I use fedora core "almost
No,
don't modify that !!
It isn't a command to install the RPM !!
You haven't to use that : it is used by RPM and DEB control files !!
I explain what I mean :
-You type "make rpm"
-It launches rpmbuild
-rpmbuild interprets amsn.spec
-amsn.spec contains instruction to copy the files in t
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 13:03 -0500, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> Also, I saw there is already an install-rpm, but it's a copy/paste of
> install.. maybe you should make it depend on the rpm rule and do a rpm
> -i...
agreed, otherwise no use in having the rpm
> This way, the user can do a rpm -e ..
I just noticed in the makefile, there is a FILES_TO_INSTALL variable that
includes the pixmapoption, pixmapbutton, pixmap... I think we should only
include the pixmapscroll, since it's the only one that is really used.
Also, I saw there is already an install-rpm, but it's a copy/paste of
in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] msn]$ make rpm
mkdir -p ./distrib
rm -f THIS.TK.SPEC
echo "%define _builddir `pwd`" > THIS.AMSN.SPEC
echo "%define _rpmdir /tmp/RPMS" >> THIS.AMSN.SPEC
echo "%define _prefix /usr" >> THIS.AMSN.SPEC
echo "%define _tmppath /tmp" >> THIS.AMSN.SPEC
echo "%define _datadir /usr/share/am
by the way... can we add a simple :
make install-deb
which would depend on deb, and would do a simple 'dpkg -i $deb_path'
the same with an make install-rpm...
KaKaRoTo
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:39:41 -0500, Le Philousophe - Phil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Lundi 21 Novembre 2005 18:45, Youne
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:39:41 -0500, Le Philousophe - Phil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Lundi 21 Novembre 2005 18:45, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
Hello, hello..
you wanted feedback, here it is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/msn$ make rpm
make: *** No rule to make target `/bin/rpm', needed by `rpm'. Stop
On Monday 21 November 2005 09:45, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> Hello, hello..
> you wanted feedback, here it is :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/msn$ make rpm
> make: *** No rule to make target `/bin/rpm', needed by `rpm'. Stop.
>
I don't think /bin/rpm is needed as a make rule. I removed it and it works on
my
Le Lundi 21 Novembre 2005 18:45, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
> Hello, hello..
> you wanted feedback, here it is :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/msn$ make rpm
> make: *** No rule to make target `/bin/rpm', needed by `rpm'. Stop.
>
Very bad thing I think I will remove this dependency. The Makefile will hang
a
Hello, hello..
you wanted feedback, here it is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/msn$ make rpm
make: *** No rule to make target `/bin/rpm', needed by `rpm'. Stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/msn$ make deb
mkdir -p ./distrib/DEB
sed "1s/#VERSION#/0.95cvs-`cat cvs_date|head -c8`/" debian/changelog.in >
debian/chan
> Arieh, can you complie with the last source before releasing the 0.95 ??
I don't have the required software to compile it at home, I will try from
work tomorrow - just note it wasn't me who made any of the compiles before.
So maybe whoever was doing them before wants to compile it?
Lio.
That's what I think too, left it alone and release it later as a plugin or small utility.Le 05-11-20 à 17:29, Youness Alaoui a écrit :ok, well, cam2mpeg uses glib so it's probably platform independant.. but it can be used using the command line, no menu for it or anything... I think of it as a util
ok, well, cam2mpeg uses glib so it's probably platform independant.. but
it can be used using the command line, no menu for it or anything... I
think of it as a utility, nothing more...
I think we still can add a button to convert from the GUI, but I don't
want to add that, as it will become
linphone extension needs a linphone-im software to be installed on the
system... it works, but we dropped support for it, so I suggest it be
removed... maybe put up a page in the wiki that talks about it and has
files attached so people who still want it can use it but the mention that
we d
Can you explain more what is this software?This is unix software? Windows software? This is independant? This is used inside a menu of aMSN to convert .cam to .mpeg? Or via the terminal to convert .cam to .mpeg?I need this info before taking a decisionLe 05-11-20 à 13:21, Youness Alaoui a écrit :3
On Sunday 20 November 2005 10:28, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:21:27 -0500, Youness Alaoui
> > 4 - I sent a mail a few weeks ago about how cvs should be re-arranged...
> > a lot of files that are there while they shouldn't, etc... if you look
> > at amsn's directory, you'll see it
http://amsn.sourceforge.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Release+GuideIf you think we should add something, just tell it, this is the thiing we should use to make the release. Everything is there.Le 05-11-20 à 13:21, Youness Alaoui a écrit : 2 - I didn't have time yesterday, and I don't know about toda
DoneLe 05-11-20 à 13:24, Youness Alaoui a écrit : what I also noticed is that there was a kind of list for the release in the 0.95RC TODO thread... if not, at least, it had the name of the packagers who should take care of which package distro.. I think it's outdated in the wiki..
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:21:27 -0500, Youness Alaoui
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for all your work, it's really appreciated.
I have a few things to talk about, but it will be short... :
1 - good job everyone, I'm such everyone here will be proud of the 0.95
release! :)
2 - I di
ok... maybe what I sent in my previous email should be added ? yes/no ?
what I also noticed is that there was a kind of list for the release in
the 0.95RC TODO thread... if not, at least, it had the name of the
packagers who should take care of which package distro.. I think it's
outdated in
Hi,
Thanks a lot for all your work, it's really appreciated.
I have a few things to talk about, but it will be short... :
1 - good job everyone, I'm such everyone here will be proud of the 0.95
release! :)
2 - I didn't have time yesterday, and I don't know about today (sunday)..
but I'll see w
I added it in a subsection of the release guide and modified the
release guide
http://amsn.sourceforge.net/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Release+Guide
As I said before, I would like people to look at the release guide to
be sure it's complete.
Le 05-11-20 à 12:10, Le Philousophe - Phil a écrit :
Hi,
I improved the distribution system : I added the support for deb files
Now to create packages you can do :
"make deb" for dpkg system
"make rpm" for rpm system
In addition I modified the version system in the autoconf script :
configure.ac
We have 4 fields at the beginning :
APPNAME which wasn
26 matches
Mail list logo
