As long as you're sure it's unused code, then go ahead, protocol.tcl needs a
little weight loss! ;)
KaKaRoTo
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:50:37AM +, Tom Hennigan wrote:
> Sounds like a good plan, I guess we can always revert any changes that
> bug, and then fix them post release =]
>
> - T
Sounds like a good plan, I guess we can always revert any changes that
bug, and then fix them post release =]
- Tom
On 17 Dec 2007, at 07:36, Harry Vennik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a big patch for protocol.tcl too (removes unused code).
> Planning was to have it wait until post-0.97, but I ha
Hi,
I've got a big patch for protocol.tcl too (removes unused code).
Planning was to have it wait until post-0.97, but I have aMSN running
with that patch for about 6 months now, without any problems, so I
think it will be safe to commit it.
May I go ahead and commit it?
Harry
---
