Hi!
> group by group isn't beautiful indeed which is why we should keep it as 'sort
> by'
sorry, I disagree
the verbs 'to sort' and 'to group' have different meanings, and should
be used appropriately
when it's about 'putting things together' the word is 'group', not 'sort'
> the group offline
Hi Youness,
> in your menus, it's too unclear, too many options,
It's one option LESS than what there is now, two if you count the
submenu, and that's with two new features. If you don't count the new
features, my proposal includes four LESS options.
> and the 'group by user group' wtf is that?
I'll answer yours too..
group by group isn't beautiful indeed which is why we should keep it as 'sort
by'
the group offline contacts together is good but I don't want to code that, it's
a little bit complicated
since we use one variable for sorting, and we would need to divide it into two
varia
yes, you're both late in the thread.. thanks, bye bye! :p
ok, j/k..
but.. I just don't feel like answering, sorry.. I'm bad at UI design, noone
ever wanted to give his advices.. I
have no idea how to make it user friendly.. I don't like either ones of your
suggestions...
ok, I'll just comment a
I'm late to this thread as well, and I find the new sorting options
confusing :S
The way I see this is as follows. From a design standpoint, there are a
few decisions that are mostly orthogonal and therefore should be
presented as orthogonal to the user (the way "hybrid mode" works now
actually af
maybe I'm a bit late in this thread, but I hadn't a definite opinion,
now that I begun translating the new keys related to it, I konw:
- I like the submenu idea
- I don't think the menu entries reflect their behaviour.
- I would suggest:
Contact sorting and grouping ->
Group by status (with "r
The colors that come with the statuses have always made it look plenty
sorted to me. And I wouldn't really have it any other way.
On 1/14/07, Madd Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing I would suggest as a change as well is in the actual
ordering of statuses.
In my opinion, the Idle and Awa
One thing I would suggest as a change as well is in the actual
ordering of statuses.
In my opinion, the Idle and Away statuses should be grouped together.
They're almost the same in terms of what they mean, so I think they
should be together.
On 1/13/07, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I think WLM has this right; The menu should have some settings like
View >
Sort contacts ascending
o Sort contacts descending
---
o Sort contacts by groups
Sort contacts by status
---
[x] Group offline contacts
[ ] Group mobile contacts
--
Hi all,
I just noticed that we have a really bad sorting of contacts and there is NO
option to allow the user to customize this and I'm
really surprised about that! at this moment, all contacts are sorted
alphabetically but grouped by status...
This looks to many people as if the list was sorted
10 matches
Mail list logo
