Re: [Amsn-devel] Patch for protocol.tcl

2006-03-24 Thread Karol Krizka
On Friday 24 March 2006 02:24, Yoda BZH wrote: > oups > > here is the patch :) > Seems like Sander already commited it along with the cases of currentmedia fixed. > On 3/24/06, Karol Krizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 17:53, Yoda BZH wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Fix a

Re: [Amsn-devel] Patch for protocol.tcl

2006-03-24 Thread Yoda BZH
oups here is the patch :) On 3/24/06, Karol Krizka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 23 March 2006 17:53, Yoda BZH wrote: > > Hi > > > > Fix a typo (currentMedia, not currentmedia) in the proc changeCurrentMedia > > > > This should fix the bug I sent while I was playing with the music plug

Re: [Amsn-devel] Patch for protocol.tcl

2006-03-23 Thread Karol Krizka
On Thursday 23 March 2006 17:53, Yoda BZH wrote: > Hi > > Fix a typo (currentMedia, not currentmedia) in the proc changeCurrentMedia > > This should fix the bug I sent while I was playing with the music plugin. > I think you forgot to attach the patch. -- Karol Krizka pgp8y7l1Y5L0U.pgp Descripti

Re: [Amsn-devel] patch for protocol.tcl (adding typer to PostEventPacketReceived)

2006-02-04 Thread Youness Alaoui
I noticed it was done... thanx to the one who did it! KKRT On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:05:22 -0500, Youness Alaoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: great idea :) anyways, no matter what you use, I just think you are right on what you said, even if it's not used by anyone, the typer should be sent to

Re: [Amsn-devel] patch for protocol.tcl (adding typer to PostEventPacketReceived)

2006-01-25 Thread Youness Alaoui
great idea :) anyways, no matter what you use, I just think you are right on what you said, even if it's not used by anyone, the typer should be sent to make sure our API is complete.. KKRT On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:51:00 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So you don't

Re: [Amsn-devel] patch for protocol.tcl (adding typer to PostEventPacketReceived)

2006-01-24 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
So you don't use messages in fact, you use another new kind of packet. That was different from your orginal message, that's why I asked the question ;-0 Thanks! Le 24 janvier 2006 à 17:27, Jonne Zutt a écrit : Hi Jerome, Yes, Sander learned me that trick. The trouble with chat_msg_received

Re: [Amsn-devel] patch for protocol.tcl (adding typer to PostEventPacketReceived)

2006-01-24 Thread Jonne Zutt
Hi Jerome, Yes, Sander learned me that trick. The trouble with chat_msg_received (which I used first) is when sending game moves, I could not avoid the chat window to start blinking, beeping and shaking. (I could replace the message by an empty one after processing, but still, very annoying). That

Re: [Amsn-devel] patch for protocol.tcl (adding typer to PostEvent PacketReceived)

2006-01-24 Thread Sander Hoentjen
because Jonne has created a games plugin, and it uses a different message type: text/x-amsngames if i remember correctly. I suggested this because it is more elegant and symplistic this way. On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 16:24 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer wrote: > I don't get it... > > Why do you use Packe

Re: [Amsn-devel] patch for protocol.tcl (adding typer to PostEvent PacketReceived)

2006-01-24 Thread Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer
I don't get it... Why do you use PacketReceived to know if someone sent a message? chat_msg_received You all have that information already inside that postevent, you don't need packetreceived for that. May be you can explain me? Le 23 janvier 2006 à 16:40, Jonne Zutt a écrit : Hi all, I w