unrequested
> Why? Was it requested or unrequested?
>
> > I would send you a screenshot of how the options for the hook script
look,
> > but I can't access it any more as I have been removed from the amsn
project.
-
Take Sur
Why? Was it requested or unrequested?
Greets.
> I would send you a screenshot of how the options for the hook script look,
> but I can't access it any more as I have been removed from the amsn project.
--
(:===:)
Alvaro J. Iradier Muro - [EMAIL PROTECTE
e -
From:
Rafael Rodríguez
To: Mailing list for developers and
everyone helping AMSN
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:04
AM
Subject: Re: [Amsn-devel] cvs_date &
svn_date
IIRC Subversion allows to change the hooks that are executed
after every commit. Couldn
I agree. The problem with the cron run script is it made hundreds of
commits. Maybe we could improve it, so it only commits svn_date if the
revision number has changed (the svn_date commit itself would increase
the revision, so we have to notice this).
Something like:
svn update
if revision < `ca
El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 16:21, Jonne Zutt escribió:
> This was the point where I said that "svn info|grep ..."
> is equal to "svnversion ."
>
> It was followed by Arieh stating some people might use packages/tarball
> and don't have svn installed.
I think that "some people" which ha
We are repeating an old thread here.
This was the point where I said that "svn info|grep ..."
is equal to "svnversion ."
It was followed by Arieh stating some people might use packages/tarball
and don't have svn installed. Then kkrt said something like use a file
with svn info first, if it does no
Is it ok to do
$ LANG=C svn info|grep 'Revision:'|cut -f2 -d' '
when generating the svn-based packages just for adding the svn revision number
to the filename?
R
El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 16:18, Youness Alaoui escribió:
> Yes, there are hooks, but I extensively read the SVN docume
Hi,
I didn't like that because we had to do a modification to svn_date just before
committing... I don't like that because if I want to do a fast commit just
before to gone I can't
Phil
Le Wednesday 20 September 2006 17:18, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
> Yes, there are hooks, but I extensively r
Yes, configure should always be in the repository, it is indeed generated from
configure.ac, but not everyone has the autoconf utility +
the .m4 and aclocal needed to generate it.. if you look at *almost* all OS
projects, they always ship in the configure file themselves ...
KKRT
On Wed, Sep
Yes, there are hooks, but I extensively read the SVN documentation, the hooks
receive a transaction ID, and a transaction is some sort of
object containing all the modified data.. once a transaction is created, it
should NOT modify a file (or for that matter, it is also
discouraged to modify th
Also, should 'configure' be in the repository? Isn't it generated from
configure.ac by autoconf?
R
El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 11:28, Álvaro J. Iradier escribió:
> So those should be removed or changed, as cvs_date is not updated
> anymore (in fact, it shouldn't exist in amsn distribu
IIRC Subversion allows to change the hooks that are executed after every commit. Couldn't a hook be added in order to increment a svn_date file after each commit?ROn 9/20/06,
Álvaro J. Iradier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So those should be removed or changed, as cvs_date is not updatedanymore (in f
So those should be removed or changed, as cvs_date is not updated
anymore (in fact, it shouldn't exist in amsn distribution, I guess
that's why there's a "file exists").
On 9/20/06, Vivia Nikolaidou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] amsn]$ grep cvs_date *
> amsn.spec:- added a relea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] amsn]$ grep cvs_date *
amsn.spec:- added a release number taken form cvs_date
bugs.tcl: if {[file exists cvs_date]==1} {
bugs.tcl: set fd [open cvs_date]
Makefile:RELEASEVERSION := `cat cvs_date|head -c8`
Makefile.in:RELEASEVERSION := `cat cvs_date|head -c8`
On
I think so. Please grep "cvs_date" * to check it's not used anywhere.
Maybe you can use svn info to get the latest revision?
Greets.
On 9/20/06, Rafael Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, then you agree that cvs_date can be removed? :=)
>
> El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 08:13, Á
BTW, then you agree that cvs_date can be removed? :=)
El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 08:13, Álvaro J. Iradier escribió:
> cvs_date is not used anymore. We removed it because there were so many
> commits just for this. We were thinking about an alternative way (like
> updating some file ins
Is there any alternative way of getting svn's revision for naming the packages
produced from it?
R
El Miércoles, 20 de Septiembre de 2006 08:13, Álvaro J. Iradier escribió:
> cvs_date is not used anymore. We removed it because there were so many
> commits just for this. We were thinking about an
cvs_date is not used anymore. We removed it because there were so many
commits just for this. We were thinking about an alternative way (like
updating some file inside the repository on every commit), but
couldn't find any.
Greets.
On 9/19/06, Rafael Rodríguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo