Re: Making reqpart in kickstart to do BIOS+UEFI with GPT on x86?

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 8:34 AM Martin Kolman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:20 AM Jiri Konecny wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Dne 01. 09. 21 v 20:22 Joe Wulf napsal(a): >> >> On Wednesday, September 1, 2021, 01:58:21 PM EDT, Neal Gompa &

Re: Making reqpart in kickstart to do BIOS+UEFI with GPT on x86?

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 1:47 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 04:08:30PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > my idea would be adding a "--hybrid" option to "reqpart" that would > > create both "BIOS" + "EFI" partitions on x86 systems. For remaining > > systems I believe they use only a

Re: Making reqpart in kickstart to do BIOS+UEFI with GPT on x86?

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 10:14 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:57:28 +0200 > Martin Kolman wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:58 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > Last week, Dan Horak notified the Cloud W

Making reqpart in kickstart to do BIOS+UEFI with GPT on x86?

Hey all, Last week, Dan Horak notified the Cloud WG that we accidentally broke ppc64le images[1] with our Hybrid BIOS+UEFI on GPT setup[2] because now there's no PReP partition being made for POWER images. He suggested in the ticket that it might be worth asking if we could have the reqpart

Re: Adding option to clearpart in kickstart to not set pmbr_boot flag?

On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 12:54 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 08:36:54AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > As a follow up to Chris' thread on hybrid BIOS/UEFI images[1], it was > > pointed out that in order to build images that actually

Adding option to clearpart in kickstart to not set pmbr_boot flag?

Hey all, As a follow up to Chris' thread on hybrid BIOS/UEFI images[1], it was pointed out that in order to build images that actually boot, I need to make sure that the protective MBR boot flag isn't set. To implement this for Fedora Cloud images, I'm using parted in %post[2]. However, that has

Re: btrfs compression by default

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:09 AM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 21:02 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is in regards to this Fedora 34 change: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BtrfsTransparentCompression#Scope > > > > The gist is to do

Re: F33: preview swap-on-ZRAM using zram-generator feature change

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:33 AM Vendula Poncova wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 4:26 AM Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am confused. For default partitioning, the idea is to no longr >> create a swap partition, instead there will be both zram-generator and >> zram-generator-defaults

Re: Making anaconda disable some storage-related systemd services in post-install config part of livecd install?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:02 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 7/8/20 12:01 PM, Vendula Poncova wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 2:07 PM Hans de Goede > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 6/30/20 6:59 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020

Re: I'm the new maintainer of pykickstart

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 7:28 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > Today we created a new, permanent, location for pykickstart: > > https://github.com/pykickstart/pykickstart/ > > And I've agreed to be the new maintainer. I've been involved with > Anaconda and pykickstart since I joined Red Hat in 2010 so

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:23 AM wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 13:25 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > > > > Josh, to be fair, I can see Neal's point here. In a way you seem > > > > to be > > > > kinda sending him in circles here:

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:30 PM Laura Abbott wrote: > > > > I also think there are other perspectives that might at least > > potentially be useful here. Right now we've mainly heard from a couple > > of community folks who are very passionate about btrfs, and Red Hat > > folks from

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Josh Boyer > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > &

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:41 AM Josh Boyer > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > &g

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 23:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote: > > > > > > I understand them. The point is, for them and even us (the > > > installer) > > > is work

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-08-24 at 07:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 19:00 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > > > > So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:16 AM Laura Abbott wrote: > > On 8/23/19 9:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > >> So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and > >> this got accepted as a release blocker: > >> > >>

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:48 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:44 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > All of this, the criteria, and the UI support for btrfs are from the > > many years old proposal to make btrfs the default filesystem. In the > > beginning, it was not ready,

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:48 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > Hey folks! > > > > So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and > > this got accepted as a release blocker: > > > >