[analog-help] DIREXCLUDE

Hello, i have some problems with the Directory Report. i did the following: SUBDIR /navigate/departments/*/ Within the departments folder, there is a folder i don't want to be listed in the directory report, so i did DIREXCLUDE /navigate/departments/bd/ But it doesnt't work. No Directory i

Re: [analog-help] DIREXCLUDE

On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hello, > > i have some problems with the Directory Report. > > i did the following: > > SUBDIR /navigate/departments/*/ > > Within the departments folder, there is a folder i don't want to be listed in > the directory report, so i did > >

[analog-help] output not recognised as text/html

Having just moved to version 3 from version 2.11, and not having changed any settings in my apache web server, I am now getting the output of analog as just text with all the HTML visible. What config settings do I need to check? Everything was working OK in version 2.11, but now the output of ve

Re: [analog-help] output not recognised as text/html

On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Godfrey Nix wrote: > Having just moved to version 3 from version 2.11, and not having changed > any settings in my apache web server, I am now getting the output of > analog as just text with all the HTML visible. > > What config settings do I need to check? Everything was w

[analog-help] analog v3/Solaris DNS lookups slow?

pe", though running a similar command at the shell seems to work fine. Cheers, Matthew. Here's an example config file. LOGFILE /www/logs/imm_access_log* OUTFILE /www/stats/imm/stats-19990715.txt LOGO none HOSTNAME imm HOSTURL http://www.inmotionmagazine.com OUTPUT ASCII GRAPHICAL

Re: [analog-help] analog v3/Solaris DNS lookups slow?

On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Matthew Kirkwood wrote: > Hi, > > I've been investigating the speed differences between > analog v2.11 and v3.x and have discovered that v3 > seems to take approx. 3 times longer for a stats run > than v2. > I don't know why this is. Most people said version 3 was faster.

Re: [analog-help] analog v3/Solaris DNS lookups slow?

On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Stephen Turner wrote: > > I don't know why this is. Most people said version 3 was faster. I assume > you compiled it with optimisation? > Sorry, I didn't read the subject of your original message. My comment above didn't refer to DNS lookups. Does version 3 go as fast as v

[analog-help] Sessions?

We're trying to figure out how to get Analog to give stats per session - i.e. For it to think to itself "ah, dialup1.domain.net came at 13:50 and finished at 14:12, so that must be one hit" Is there any way of doing this (please say "yes", manual analysis is boring me sensless!) Hmm, not well ph

Re: [analog-help] Sessions?

On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Madley, Paul wrote: > We're trying to figure out how to get Analog to give stats per session - > i.e. For it to think to itself "ah, dialup1.domain.net came at 13:50 and > finished at 14:12, so that must be one hit" > > Is there any way of doing this (please say "yes", manua

Re: [analog-help] Sessions?

"Madley, Paul" wrote: > We're trying to figure out how to get Analog to give stats per session - > i.e. For it to think to itself "ah, dialup1.domain.net came at 13:50 and > finished at 14:12, so that must be one hit" > > Is there any way of doing this (please say "yes", manual analysis is bori

Re: [analog-help] DIREXCLUDE

Gerit -- But meanwhile... you can use REQEXCLUDE /navigate/departments/bd/* if that meets your needs. Or use pages (P) as one of the DIRCOLS - if the undesired directory contains things that are not defined as pages. cheers, Marj Stephen Turner wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]