On 12 Jan 00, at 14:57, Brian's Mail wrote about [analog-help] analog:
Warning C: Command line arg:
> I am getting this error message, what does it mean and how can it be
> fixed. I didn't see anything in the docs.
Not sure if it's your case too, but I had this error the other day
because o
I am getting this error message, what does it mean and how can it be fixed.
I didn't see anything in the docs. The used to work before I upgraded to 4.
I have this running on another server with the same config file and it works
fine. Both of these are FreeBSD servers, and both installs were done
It is extremely likely that using one of the LOWMEM commands, probably
HOSTLOWMEM 3, will fix it.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
"Children from St Lawrence's School have buried a
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>
> Example 1:
> ---
>
> > LOGFILE log0
>
> Processed with default or any autodetected format
>
> > LOGFORMAT format1
>
> Analog learns about format1.
>
> > LOGFILE log1
>
> Processed with default or format1
>
> > LOGFORMAT format2
>
> An
Jim Sander wrote:
> This is what I meant...
Jim, let me try to step through it to make sure you and everyone (including
me) are clear...
Example 1:
---
> LOGFILE log0
Processed with default or any autodetected format
> LOGFORMAT format1
Analog learns about format1.
> LOGFILE l
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Hahnel William J wrote:
> I added the Daily Report with "FULLDAYCOLS R" and "FULLDAYROWS 7" to get
> myself a report of daily request numbers for the last seven days. I also
> have "LASTSEVEN ON" set so the General Summary will show totals for the last
> seven days. The con
I added the Daily Report with "FULLDAYCOLS R" and "FULLDAYROWS 7" to get
myself a report of daily request numbers for the last seven days. I also
have "LASTSEVEN ON" set so the General Summary will show totals for the last
seven days. The confusion is that when comparing the total in the General
OK, I blew it once again, and just realized.
This is what I wrote...
LOGFILE log0LOGFILE log0
LOGFORMAT format1 LOGFILE log1
LOGFILE log1LOGFILE log2
LOGFORMAT format2 LOGFILE log3
LOGFILE log2LOGFORMAT format1
LOGFILE log3LOGFO
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Jim Sander wrote:
>
>
> > Anyway, Jim, I think you're still confused. LOGFORMAT/LOGFILE pairs don't
> > define log formats for logfiles in the way that you seem to expect. A
> > LOGFILE command just says "analyse this LOGFILE with the current LOGFORMAT".
> > It doesn't defin
> Whoops, sorry, I just sent the half the original message back to the list by
> pressing the wrong key. CTRL-C is too close to CTRL-X...
Gee, I think I said that quite recently myself. I should have realized
that post would be too long for the list to process normally anyway- I'll
keep it sho
On 11 Jan 2000, David Williams wrote:
>
> 208.219.77.29 - - [09/Jan/2000:01:01:05 -0500] "HEAD
> /doc/iug/WorldWideWeb.html
> HTTP/1.1" 200 0
> 208.219.77.29 - - [09/Jan/2000:01:01:05 -0500] "HEAD
> /doc/iug/WorldWideWeb.html
> HTTP/1.1" 200 0 "-" "Gulliver/1.3"
> 152.173.100.126 - - [09/Jan/2000
Hi Aengus
Thanks for that - but I'm afraid I'm still not getting very far!
I have all the necessary files (analog.exe, analog.cfg and lang/uk.lng) in
the cgi-bin directory of my web site. Everyone has FULL CONTROL on this
directory and execute is enabled on this directory.
I still get the foll
12 matches
Mail list logo