hello ...
just some added comments here ... might be somewhat off topic, but worth a point.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 06:20:03PM +0100, Stephen Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, David Brownlee wrote:
> >
> > In what way does redhat lose with package integration? The main
> > ways I c
well ...
updating analog is quite easy ...
cd /usr/ports/www/analog
make install && make clean && make distclean
and then you have it ... all cleanly installed. Of course, you need to set up the
analog.cfg on your own.
Well, as far as I know ... the Red Hat rpm's for analog do work, and do
on 4/13/2000 2:18 PM, tim at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, as far as I know ... the Red Hat rpm's for analog do work, and don't
> screw up your system. However, I've only
> compiled analog myself on Red Hat systems.
>
So did I, until I had some severe compiler problems with gcc last fall. Th
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, tim wrote:
>
> the .deb packages sound quite good ... it sounds like they work like the ports! :-)
>
Absolutely. I think the BSD ports system is good too, from the little I know
about it. In Debian you just need to type
apt-get install analog
and it will go and fetch it
