Hi,
I was browsing through the list of DNS resolvers that
Steve posted on the Analog site. There are quite a
few and probably more that didn't make the list.
Logresolve seems pretty slow. Analog's built-in
resolve mechanism has the cool feature of caching
previous lookups. Do any of the
jdresolve is fairly quick and doesn't need much overhead.
It takes a little time to determine the optimal configuration
for jdresolve, but the results at the end of each run provide
useful data to use in the configuration process. If you intend
to use large log files (2.5+ GB), you might wish to
I'm using the dns-terror stuff here, and have been most happy with it ...
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, James Herrmann wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing through the list of DNS resolvers that
Steve posted on the Analog site. There are quite a
few and probably more that didn't make the list.
Logresolve
