"Paul A. Franz, P.E." wrote:
> all the lines appear to be in output2.c:
>
> [root@Beaker analog4.01]# cat output2.c | grep -nC gif
> 168-fputs(" 169-htmlfprintf(outf, od->outstyle, od->imagedir, &(od->html), FALSE);
> 170:fputs("html2.gif\"\n", outf);
> 171-fputs("alt=\"HTML 2.0 C
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
>
> The hassle is that the html also has to be changed to properly display the
> png files.
>
What needs to be changed? Surely works just as well as
, on browsers that support PNG?
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.c
At 08:46 AM 1/10/2000 Jeremy Wadsack sez:
>"Paul A. Franz, P.E." wrote:
>
> > I am thinking of editing the source for analog to use png but most
> > certainly will botch that up not knowing enough to keep it from being a
> > major project.
>
>I agree with Stephen, that would be wuite simple. You c
"Paul A. Franz, P.E." wrote:
> I am thinking of editing the source for analog to use png but most
> certainly will botch that up not knowing enough to keep it from being a
> major project.
I agree with Stephen, that would be wuite simple. You could load all the source
into your favorite editor a
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
>
> I am thinking of editing the source for analog to use png but most
> certainly will botch that up not knowing enough to keep it from being a
> major project.
>
It would be close to trivial.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://
At 01:29 AM 1/10/2000 Stephen Turner sez:
>Yes, the current versions of both MSIE or Netscape don't do transparency,
>for a start. Also, you'd be surprised how many people are still using
>versions 2 and 3.
thanks to you I have very good stats on this. I have almost no hits on
those old browser
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
> At 02:01 AM 1/8/2000 Stephen Turner sez:
> >This is answered in the FAQ.
>
> You mean this?
>
> 4.It would be better if you used png's instead of gif's.
> I'm aware of the issues. But png support isn't good enough even in new
> browsers; an
"Paul A. Franz, P.E." wrote:
> At 02:01 AM 1/8/2000 Stephen Turner sez:
> >This is answered in the FAQ.
>
> You mean this?
>
> 4.It would be better if you used png's instead of gif's.
> I'm aware of the issues. But png support isn't good enough even in new
> browsers; and I have always made
At 02:01 AM 1/8/2000 Stephen Turner sez:
>This is answered in the FAQ.
You mean this?
4.It would be better if you used png's instead of gif's.
I'm aware of the issues. But png support isn't good enough even in new
browsers; and I have always made a point of
designing analog to work ev
This is answered in the FAQ.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
"Children from St Lawrence's School have buried a time capsule to mark both
the millennium and National Tree Week."
I am a wee bit concerned about using GIF files on web sites I host
commercially. I would like to migrate to using PNG exclusively.
Is there a way to have Analog generate its report referencing analogous PNG
files instead of GIFs?
Here are a couple things I wish to quote that give rise to the q
11 matches
Mail list logo
