Re: [analog-help] Yet another LOGFORMAT plea

2001-10-09 Thread Royce Howland
Jeremy Wadsack wrote: > > The original lines were combined format. The 'corrupt' lines were in > common format. So adding tells Analog to process both types. I don't > know why your Apache is logging in common format for some lines, but > as long as Analog knows how to read them, it will. You're

Re: [analog-help] Yet another LOGFORMAT plea

2001-10-09 Thread Jeremy Wadsack
Royce Howland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Jeremy Wadsack wrote: >> >> Try adding 'LOGFORMAT common' to your configuration file. > Well, that stopped the errors but I can't see why. The log file isn't > using common format. Indeed, if I only have common in the config file, > the process exits with t

Re: [analog-help] Yet another LOGFORMAT plea

2001-10-09 Thread Royce Howland
Jeremy Wadsack wrote: > > Try adding 'LOGFORMAT common' to your configuration file. Well, that stopped the errors but I can't see why. The log file isn't using common format. Indeed, if I only have common in the config file, the process exits with the same error as before -- too many corrupt lin

Re: [analog-help] Yet another LOGFORMAT plea

2001-10-09 Thread Jeremy Wadsack
Royce Howland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > * Sample log entry: > --- > toccata.3ge.com - - [02/Oct/2001:10:53:42 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 > 2369 "-" "Mozilla/4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)" > --- > * I just put in my first Apache web server recently, and analog 5.03 > can't handle the log files. I

[analog-help] Yet another LOGFORMAT plea

2001-10-09 Thread Royce Howland
I've trolled the mail list archives and seen quite a few requests for help with LOGFORMAT-related issues, but none quite on target with what I'm experiencing. Apologies in advance for the length of this post; if you're not interested in helping diagnose an odd problem, feel free to delete this mes