Re: [analog-help] performance problem with RHES 3

2004-03-25 Thread analog-help
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Yavor Trapkov wrote: > - I recompiled analog (from the SRPMS) but the problem remains > - then uncompressed the log file - it became ~6GB and analog gives > > /usr/bin/analog: Warning F: Failed to open logfile > /var/log/www/archive/March_2004.log: ignoring it > > it wor

Re: [analog-help] performance problem with RHES 3

2004-03-25 Thread analog-help
- I recompiled analog (from the SRPMS) but the problem remains - then uncompressed the log file - it became ~6GB and analog gives /usr/bin/analog: Warning F: Failed to open logfile /var/log/www/archive/March_2004.log: ignoring it it work however with smaller files, 400MB for example are th

Re: [analog-help] performance problem with RHES 3

2004-03-24 Thread analog-help
You did recompile Analog on the new RHES system, right? Have you tried performance testing the gzip on both systems, in case that is where the bottle neck is? -- Jeremy Wadsack Wadsack-Allen Digital Group Yavor Trapkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wednesday, March 24, 2004 5:15 AM): > Hello, I just

[analog-help] performance problem with RHES 3

2004-03-24 Thread analog-help
Hello, I just moved our web server from RH7.3 to RHES 3.1 and I experience a performance problem with analog, the two servers are the same (2x1.4P3 1.2GB RAM). We have let say big log files ~30 milion lines, and I process them compressed UNCOMPTESS *.gz "gzip -cd" I tried to use the LOWMEM opti