We have defined a custom log in our Apache config file :-
LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b \%{Referer}i\
\%{User-Agent}i\ (%T) combined
No matter what I do, I cannot get analog to recognise this format,
every entry is rejected, here is an example of the debug output :-
C: 218.80.221.91 -
On Tuesday, September 04, 2007 7:16 AM [EDT],
Kevin Band [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have also tried
APACHELOGFORMAT (%h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b \%{Referer}i\
\%{User-Agent}i\ (%T))
You're using () as a delimiter within the string, as well as around it. Try
APACHELOGFORMAT '%h %l %u %t \%r\ %s
Discovered that there isn't actually anything wrong with the LogFormat
commands that I'm specifying, the problem is that I'm trying to specify
the LogFormat within a config file, but specify the log-file from the
command line.
If the config file doesn't contain a LogFile entry, then the
Aengus wrote:
Analog does record some time information - how many requests occurred
in every 5 minute period, for example. But it doesn't record which
requests occurred within any given 5 minute (or any other) period. So
you can use your cache file for September to find out that X number
of
On Tuesday, September 04, 2007 7:47 AM [EDT],
Kevin Band [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Discovered that there isn't actually anything wrong with the LogFormat
commands that I'm specifying, the problem is that I'm trying to
specify
the LogFormat within a config file, but specify the log-file from the
Melissa - Do you know anything about this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Per Jessen
Sent: Sun 9/2/2007 6:30 AM
To: analog-help@lists.meer.net
Subject: Re: [analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The
next'best'analyzer...?)
Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Per,
Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
...
How about if I'd like to use a locally available version of e.g.
libpcre, libgd, libz and libpng? As a sysadmin surely that has
crossed your mind.
Yes. About 50% of the time it doesn't work and I have to manually type
in --with-gd=/some/path
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 11:59:04 Per Jessen wrote:
Dima, should we ever get that far, don't feel obliged to use the
autoconf'ed version.
Heh. I hope you'll be kind enough to give me the choice -- most of them
are run ./configure or go lose yourself in twisty maze of little shell
I agree with the big D.
compiling analog was not difficult on either linux or solaris because
of the simplicity of the tool setup.
this is not the case with so many tools that I want to run on solaris
10 sparc, it is so much work because the Unix world has so fractured
in the last five years...
9 matches
Mail list logo
