Zourarakis, Demetrio (COT) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing "after the fact" reporting and have a bunch of daily log
> files dating back 4 years...
>
> Is there a way to batch the analog execution sequentially so that I
> don't have to manipulate the filenames and make mistakes?
>
> Any suggestions
Thanks. Aengus.
It would have created 1012 reports...
I concatenated the logfiles using MS DOS command line into one BIG
logfile...
Thanks.
Demetrio P. Zourarakis, Ph.D., GISPGISCI, CMS-RSASPRS, CMS-GIS/LISASPRS
Remote Sensing/GIS Analyst
Division of Geographic Information
Commonwealth Office of T
Zourarakis, Demetrio (COT) wrote:
> Thanks. Aengus.
> It would have created 1012 reports...
> I concatenated the logfiles using MS DOS command line into one BIG
> logfile...
No, LOGFILE *.LOG will creat ONE report containing the data from all the
logfiles.
Analog has always allowed you to crea
OK. I did not know that. I am a novice at Analog.
Thanks, Aengus.
d
-Original Message-
From: analog-help-boun...@lists.meer.net
[mailto:analog-help-boun...@lists.meer.net] On Behalf Of Aengus
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:21 PM
To: Support for analog web log analyzer
Subject: Re: [ana
Hello, I am looking at Analog. I am a current summary.net user. The
pay for an update to get features I am not going to need, but mostly
need new user agent strings change sets is getting tiresome.
My general questions are:
Looking at the analog demo stats, I am pretty sure my clients woul
Scott Haneda wrote:
> Hello, I am looking at Analog. I am a current summary.net user. The
> pay for an update to get features I am not going to need, but mostly
> need new user agent strings change sets is getting tiresome.
>
> My general questions are:
>
> Looking at the analog demo stats, I
6 matches
Mail list logo
