information from the upper-right cell in the table on this
page:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778.aspx
"4 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE set"
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Nick Altmann wrote:
> I've had a little success working around the 2GB memor
I've had a little success working around the 2GB memory limit issue with the
32-bit analog.exe for Windows.
After trying to see if I could re-compile Analog with 3GB support, I found
it was possible to directly edit the existing binary using this command:
editbin.exe /LARGEADDRESSAWARE analog.exe
What type of bounty would entice someone to compile a 64-bit Windows binary
(i.e. one that is not limited to 2GB of memory)?
+
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
| Analo
Apologies if this is a known issue, but it looks like the analog.cx
domain may have expired.
Here's the page I get "Council of Country Code Administrators Limited
- Powered By Kayako SupportSuite"
+
| TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this
Thanks for the suggestion Paul. Unfortunately, I'm hitting the 2GB
per-process limit with some of my analog reports. I think that limit would
still be present when running the 32-bit version on a 64-bit Windows.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Paul Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
ted. If the freely available Windows
SDK <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_SDK> is installed, 64-bit
applications can be built on the command line using the x64 cross-compiler (
Cl.exe) supplied with the SDK."
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Aengus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I've reviewed the archives (and found plenty of "64 bit" discussion), but
have not been able to find a binary compiled for 64 bit Windows.
Has anyone made a "analog_60w64.zip" available for download?
Compiling from source (on Windows) is currently outside my skill set, but
the 2GB memory limit of
I'm getting the "Fatal error: Ran out of memory" message on one of the
reports I run. I read through some of the list archives for tips, but I
couldn't figure out what causes the error message. (i.e. Am I out of
physical memory? Am I out of virtual memory? Am I out of addressable
memory?)
If more
> Is there any difference between a "foo" reference from Yahoo
> and a "foo" reference from google? It sounds like you should probably be
> looking at the Search report, rather than the referrer report.
Using yahoo and google may have made that example unecessarily confusing. I
do use the search
> If lines 2 and 3 aren't indented, there would be no way to
> recognize that they are subsets.
Thanks for the reply. For my particular purpose, I'm more interested in the
absolute order of referring pages than in any grouping of them. I'd also
like to leave out (in my example) lines like "http:/
This should be a simple thing, but I can't figure it out from the docs.
Currently my Referrer report comes out something like this:
#pages URL
100 http://www.google.com/search
60 http://www.google.com/search?q=foo (indented)
40 http://www.google.com/search?q=bar (
> Is it possible to exclude the %bytes and time columns from the Request
Report? (but retain the date column)
Yes. Try this section of the docs for an answer:
http://www.analog.cx/docs6/othreps.html#othCOLS
You'll need to add a line something like this to your configuration:
REQCOLS Rd
+--
12 matches
Mail list logo
