Re: [analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next 'best'analyzer...?)

2007-08-31 Thread Aengus
Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dimitri Maziuk wrote: Alright, then perhaps not autoconf itself, but the general edit the header file configuration method is a little dated, so some kind of assisted config tool would come in handy. My take on it, if one can't edit the defines in

Re: [analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next 'best'analyzer...?)

2007-08-31 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On Friday 31 August 2007 14:26:43 Aengus wrote: Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dimitri Maziuk wrote: Alright, then perhaps not autoconf itself, but the general edit the header file configuration method is a little dated, so some kind of assisted config tool would come in handy.

Re: [analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next 'best'analyzer...?)

2007-08-31 Thread Per Jessen
Aengus wrote: Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: autoconf is used by 99.9% of the software I use. That alone seems to be a strong indication of its distinct advantages over hand-editing a pile of header files. If it was up to me, analog-7.0 would be autoconf'ed. What exactly is it that