Bah; belay that. Chalk it up to spending too long trying to turn the
project names into something human ;). The files are MEANT to include
en.zero et al (I'm not entirely sure why those are being split out -
presumably it was a request at some point).
On 11 March 2015 at 00:50, Oliver Keyes wrote
Hey,
This may be a known, but just in case it isn't; the pageview dumps at
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-all-sites/ are meant to
follow the spec set out at
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-all-sites/README.txt
Instead, it appears that for (presumably, zero-rated) requests
Cross-posting from wikitech-l, this will definitely be of interest to those of
you on this list who work with our APIs.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Gabriel Wicke
> Date: March 10, 2015 at 15:23:03 PDT
> To: Wikimedia developers ,
> wikitech-ambassd...@lists.wikimedia.org, Development and
Sounds good to me.
On Mar 10, 2015 5:58 PM, "Adam Baso" wrote:
> wprov didn't seem to show up as a parameter in looking at the query field
> on an hour of logs on en.m.wikipedia.org via Hadoop, so I think we're
> okay there.
>
> As for that additional data point, that's a good idea. Bernd, Dmitry
wprov didn't seem to show up as a parameter in looking at the query field
on an hour of logs on en.m.wikipedia.org via Hadoop, so I think we're okay
there.
As for that additional data point, that's a good idea. Bernd, Dmitry, how
about we do: sfi (image) and sft (text) ?
-Adam
On Tue, Mar 10, 20
On Mar 10, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Adam Baso wrote:
>
> We're going to use the following format:
>
> ?wprov=<3_char_feature>
>
> For the first version on iOS, this will be
>
> ?wprov=safi1
>
> And Android:
>
> ?wprov=safa1
Thanks for the closing the loop on this. Dan, Adam – have you guys consid
Hi Timo,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:46:53PM +0100, Timo Tijhof wrote:
> Is that in public version control somewhere?
The real documentation is under revision control (through wikitech).
As explained in the first section of the README, that README is just a
pointer to the authorative Documentatio
Is that in public version control somewhere?
Assuming not, is there a path towards that?
While I don't mind so much the README, I'm more concerned about the landing
page at http://dumps.wikimedia.org/ which is quite dated and would benefit from
being in public version control so that maintainer
Is wprov only used by the apps?
On Mar 10, 2015 12:59 PM, "Gergo Tisza" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Adam Baso wrote:
>
>> We're going to use the following format:
>>
>> ?wprov=<3_char_feature>
>>
> Don't forget to document this publicly once it is deployed.
> https://www.mediawiki
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Adam Baso wrote:
> We're going to use the following format:
>
> ?wprov=<3_char_feature>
>
Don't forget to document this publicly once it is deployed.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Parameters_to_index.php is probably a
good place for that (even though tech
Hi,
[ just to keep archives happy ]
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Christian Aistleitner wrote:
> After the next rsync (in ~1 hour) the new README should be live.
The new README is live now at:
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-all-sites/README.txt
Have fun,
Christian
We're going to use the following format:
?wprov=<3_char_feature>
For the first version on iOS, this will be
?wprov=safi1
And Android:
?wprov=safa1
-Adam
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Adam Baso wrote:
> Okay, we'll plan on wprov.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Dan Garry wrote:
>
Yay; thank you! :)
On 10 March 2015 at 12:16, Christian Aistleitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:45:53AM -0400, Oliver Keyes wrote:
>> [ Typo in secondary documentation of pagecounts-all-sites ]
>
> Thanks, fixed in HDFS.
>
> After the next rsync (in ~1 hour) the new README should
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:45:53AM -0400, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> [ Typo in secondary documentation of pagecounts-all-sites ]
Thanks, fixed in HDFS.
After the next rsync (in ~1 hour) the new README should be live.
Have fun,
Christian
--
quelltextlich e.U. \\ Christian Aistle
I just want to make sure it can be found. I see you added it to the ToC at
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Cluster, so I think it’ll be fine.
> On Mar 9, 2015, at 18:51, Christian Aistleitner
> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:54:56AM -0400, Andrew Otto wro
I think. Well, I hope.
The whitelist at
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-all-sites/README.txt
claims that meta.mediawiki.org is whitelisted. As is
usability.mediawiki.org. As is...you get the picture ;)
Unless I've had a stroke and am hallucinating the *.mediawiki.org, we
mean wikimedi
16 matches
Mail list logo
