Ok, thanks for clarifying and this pointer, Aaron.
Bob
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
> No way of searching the content of deleted pages. You can start with the
> `archive` table. You might find that you can identify edits that add 'hoax'
> templates by performing a rege
No way of searching the content of deleted pages. You can start with the
`archive` table. You might find that you can identify edits that add
'hoax' templates by performing a regex match on `archive.ar_comment`.
-Aaron
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Robert West
wrote:
> Thanks, Aaron!
>
> O
Thanks, Aaron!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
> Ahh yes. Sorry for not responding sooner. The best way to get deleted
> article text is by getting the appropriate permission with a Wikimedia user
> account and then using that account to hit the web API. E.g.
> https://e
Ahh yes. Sorry for not responding sooner. The best way to get deleted
article text is by getting the appropriate permission with a Wikimedia user
account and then using that account to hit the web API. E.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=help&modules=query%2Bdeletedrevisions
The best
Aaron, any chance you know the answer to this question? I have a vague
memory that we talked about deleted pages and their text some time back.
This data should live somewhere, right? given that deleted pages can be
restored.
Thanks,
Leila
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Leila Zia wrote:
> swi
Theoretically we should be able to request the Event Logging endpoint URI
from anywhere. But I don't know how CORS is set up on that endpoint after
this recent change.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> Gotcha. And we can put EL on labs?
>
> On 25 June 2015 at 09:56, Dan And
Gotcha. And we can put EL on labs?
On 25 June 2015 at 09:56, Dan Andreescu wrote:
> Update on this:
>
> * Piwik is not finding a lot of love. The readership team is working on
> puppetizing it and we theoretically have hardware to run it, but we haven't
> decided it's a good idea for Analytics t
Update on this:
* Piwik is not finding a lot of love. The readership team is working on
puppetizing it and we theoretically have hardware to run it, but we haven't
decided it's a good idea for Analytics to support this yet.
* We're a (bit?) more optimistic about parallel Event Logging processors.
FYI, the two places where people are talking about the new Pageview API
that we are building are here:
* Original bugzilla (now phabricator) ticket (yes the title no longer
applies): https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T44259
* Analytics list thread:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/analytics/2
Two quick updates:
What Oliver said resonates with us, we are doing everything possible to
focus and keep the project moving instead of satisfying all possible
requirements at launch.
We have been working our goals (not yet finalized) to include "Pageview API
by September". There is quite a bit
Sean, fully agreed this is a problem. The way I see it, I don't think
there's an easy solution. This query is made with a template that fills in
different versions of an Event Logging schema. This is bad for more than
just this performance reason:
* when a new schema revision is implemented, ei
11 matches
Mail list logo
