; Behalf Of *Aaron Halfaker
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 16, 2016 18:11
> *To:* A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
> an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
> *Subject:* Re: [Analytics] [Pageviews] [Technical] Simplifying the
> available static dum
: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an
interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Analytics] [Pageviews] [Technical] Simplifying the available
static dumps of pageview data
dumps.wikimedia.org/analytics
Does "analytics" mean anything in th
>
> dumps.wikimedia.org/analytics
Does "analytics" mean anything in this context? Why not aim for something
like dumps.wikimedia.org/views?
-Aaron
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
> It's also the International Day of Women and Girls in Science!
>
> Sounds like a good summ
It's also the International Day of Women and Girls in Science!
Sounds like a good summary.
On 11 February 2016 at 07:31, Dan Andreescu wrote:
> I almost revived this thread on Mardi Gras, but I didn't want to be known as
> The Holiday Crusher so I waited. Today is relatively safe [1] :)
>
> Ok,
I almost revived this thread on Mardi Gras, but I didn't want to be known
as The Holiday Crusher so I waited. Today is relatively safe [1] :)
Ok, there are three main points being made:
1. deprecating the old datasets
2. liberating ourselves from the old format
3. reorganizing the dumps page
My
Erik's proposal sounds very reasonable.
There might be some confusion about what we mean by "keeping the old
datasets for longitudinal analysis". No one is planning to remove the old
static dumps, just stop generating them/maintaining them going forward.
I also want to echo Nuria regarding the hu
>As I just mentioned to Dan in a private email conversation, keeping
datasets even with imperfect measurements is important. Particularly for
longitudinal analysis.
Have in mind that maintaining these old dumps is not "free", it causes a
lot of confusion and maintenance costs to have several pagevi
r the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an
> interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
> Subject: Re: [Analytics] [Pageviews] [Technical] Simplifying the available
> static dumps of pageview data
>
>
>
> Apologies! I realized it was Christmas Eve but I by no means m
a and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Analytics] [Pageviews] [Technical] Simplifying the available
static dumps of pageview data
Apologies! I realized it was Christmas Eve but I by no means meant to rush
this conversation. Take as long as you like to answer to the thread and enjoy
your holidays eve
>
> Erik
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Analytics [mailto:analytics-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Maurice Vergeer
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 24, 2015 15:12
> *To:* A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has
> an interest in Wi
A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an
interest in Wikipedia and analytics.
Subject: Re: [Analytics] [Pageviews] [Technical] Simplifying the available
static dumps of pageview data
Dear all,
As I just mentioned to Dan in a private email conversation, keepin
Dear all,
As I just mentioned to Dan in a private email conversation, keeping
datasets even with imperfect measurements is important. Particularly for
longitudinal analysis.
Also, from what I understand - me being a newby here - is that the data are
stored in separate files. Dan suggested reorder
Nothing against this approach!
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Dan Andreescu
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Alex Druk wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>> Happy holidays!
>> Good idea to combine these datasets! However we have one more dataset by
>> Erik Zachte : http://dumps.wikimedia.org/ot
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Alex Druk wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> Happy holidays!
> Good idea to combine these datasets! However we have one more dataset by
> Erik Zachte : http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-ez/
>
And that's an important one! But I was thinking we could re-organize the
pag
Hi Dan,
Happy holidays!
Good idea to combine these datasets! However we have one more dataset by
Erik Zachte : http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-ez/
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Dan Andreescu
wrote:
> I should have started this discussion a while ago, but it's easier to
> catch up
I should have started this discussion a while ago, but it's easier to catch
up on work during vacation :)
We currently have 3 available static file dumps of pageview data. I will
explain them here and explain my thoughts on simplifying the situation.
Feel free to turn this thread into a wiki.
*
16 matches
Mail list logo
