On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 4 August 2015 at 04:24, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oliver Keyes, 04/08/2015 00:12:
a lot less cautious about our sampling
rate!
A bit, perhaps, not a lot. Sampling is not just a
Indeed; I'm familiar with the WMF's values ;). I was trying to work
out if it was a hardware cost thing, a privacy thing, a...etc, etc.
On 13 August 2015 at 10:36, Dan Andreescu dandree...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 4 August
On 4 August 2015 at 04:24, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Oliver Keyes, 04/08/2015 00:12:
a lot less cautious about our sampling
rate!
A bit, perhaps, not a lot. Sampling is not just a performance matter.
Could you expand on that?
Nemo
nm, clarified with Kevin.
On Aug 3, 2015, at 18:38, Dario Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
what are the implications (if any) on event validation?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Very excited to see this moving forward
On Mon, Aug
what are the implications (if any) on event validation?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Very excited to see this moving forward
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Heyo, Discovery team!
(Analytics CCd)
This
Very excited to see this moving forward
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Heyo, Discovery team!
(Analytics CCd)
This is just a quick writeup of the Scaleable Event Systems meeting
that Erik, Dan, Stas and I went to (although just from my
perspective).
