Re: [Analytics] Farewell, Erik!

2019-02-06 Thread Leila Zia
Erik, It's been an incredible honor to work with you as a colleague and a volunteer. Thank you for the stats and all the conversations about categories, topics, languages, ..., but even more so for showing me the path and the purpose, time after time. I will dearly miss you in Wikimedia Foundation

Re: [Analytics] Farewell, Erik!

2019-02-06 Thread Christian Aistleitner
Hi Erik, Thank you for your work! When I first came across Wikistats, it completely blew my mind. Such a huge collection of raw data turned into digestible information. It's amazing, stunning, and above all: enlightening. I've spent countless hours digging through Wikistats in awe. But besides t

Re: [Analytics] Farewell, Erik!

2019-02-06 Thread effe iets anders
I have always enjoyed Erik's insightful input - especially the insights that people don't like to hear at first. I trust that much more of that is to come in the future, so I'm not ready to say farewells :). I wouldn't be able to accurately summarize it anyway. Erik, I hope that you'll find a lot

Re: [Analytics] Farewell, Erik!

2019-02-06 Thread Pine W
Thanks for your work, Erik. I hope that we will see you in the future. This is the first time that I can recall hearing about a person retiring from WMF. Volunteer retirements and semi-retirements happen regularly, and the reasons that I hear for those retirements are often sad. It's nice to hear

[Analytics] Farewell, Erik!

2019-02-06 Thread Dario Taraborelli
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise v