On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Gabriel Wicke wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Bryan Davis wrote:
>
>> * Only 1% of Action API traffic comes from WMF servers (excluding labs)
>
>
> This is a lot lower than I'd expect. Is this based on Varnish logs, or
> specific logs / metrics emitted b
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Bryan Davis wrote:
> * Only 1% of Action API traffic comes from WMF servers (excluding labs)
This is a lot lower than I'd expect. Is this based on Varnish logs, or
specific logs / metrics emitted by the action API code itself? If it
is using Varnish logs, then m
> The existing ua based classification of "spider" misses a lot of user-agents
that are obviously bots
If a bot is identifying as such we should be marking it as "spider", please
let us know what patterns you think we are missing.
Let's also have in mind that we have a lot of traffic of user agent
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz wrote:
> Team:
>
> Please take a look at Mediawiki API data needs, they made a nice wiki page
> for us to understand what type of data do they need.
>
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:BDavis_%28WMF%29/Projects/Action_API_request_analytics
>
> We alr
Team:
Please take a look at Mediawiki API data needs, they made a nice wiki page
for us to understand what type of data do they need.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:BDavis_%28WMF%29/Projects/Action_API_request_analytics
We already talked with them about using our user_agent data on wmf tabl
