Re: [Analytics] Vital signs no longer displaying legacy pageview data

>Anyway, I think the ideal would be to have druid + a visualization package instead of vital signs and then I could filter for exactly what I want, and I wouldn't have to >ask if includes bots ;-) Since vital signs uses the pageview definition you can also take a look a https://meta.wikimedia.org/

Re: [Analytics] Vital signs no longer displaying legacy pageview data

I often consult vital signs (usually leading up to the monthly metrics meeting) to see how our traffic is doing. I'm always hoping it is bouncing back up and it's something that could be presented at the metrics meeting. I wish Vital Signs had monthly pageview data. I know I can use the smoothin

Re: [Analytics] Vital signs no longer displaying legacy pageview data

Hi Kevin I confirm that Vital Sign pageviews DO NOT contain the traffic we flag as automated (see the code here ) Joseph On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Kevin Led

Re: [Analytics] Vital signs no longer displaying legacy pageview data

Can you confirm that Vital Signs pageviews include web crawler and bot traffic? On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Nuria Ruiz wrote: > Hello, > > The UI for vital signs will no longer display legacy pageview data > (pageviews calculations that used the old definition). We are working > towards hav

[Analytics] Vital signs no longer displaying legacy pageview data

Hello, The UI for vital signs will no longer display legacy pageview data (pageviews calculations that used the old definition). We are working towards having one consistent pageview definition [1] in every tool that surfaces pageview data. Please have in mind that the new definition only exists