On October 30, updates were made to how metrics are calculated for the
Vital Signs dashboards [1]. The result is an apparent jump up or down on
some of the metrics starting October 30th. This is because we did not
update the existing historical data. We are planning on recalculating all
the hist
>
>
>
> - Namespace Edits and Pages Created now include pages in all namespaces
> and pages that have been deleted. The plots for these metrics generally
> show a step up. On wikis where most of activity occurs on pages other than
> in namespace '0' (like Meta and Commons), you can see a dramatic
On 4 November 2014 11:11, Howie Fung wrote:
>
>> - Namespace Edits and Pages Created now include pages in all namespaces
>> and pages that have been deleted. The plots for these metrics generally
>> show a step up. On wikis where most of activity occurs on pages other than
>> in namespace '0' (
Understood for page creations. The metric is named "Page creations". We
ought to have a metric called "Content page creations" or "Unique content
page creators".
One bit of complication: How do you feel about the draft namespace for
enwiki? Should it be included in content page creations?
As f
On 4 November 2014 12:00, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
> Understood for page creations. The metric is named "Page creations". We
> ought to have a metric called "Content page creations" or "Unique content
> page creators".
>
​Yeah, having both would be great but I don't want to demand the world on a
Created tracking bug -- please add yourselves to the cc if desired.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72973
-Toby
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:07 PM, James Forrester
wrote:
> On 4 November 2014 12:00, Aaron Halfaker wrote:
>
>> Understood for page creations. The metric is named "Pa
Thanks Toby! :-)
On 4 November 2014 12:38, Toby Negrin wrote:
> Created tracking bug -- please add yourselves to the cc if desired.
>
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72973
>
> -Toby
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:07 PM, James Forrester > wrote:
>
>> On 4 November 2014 12:00, Aar
to add some context to the present approach, you may remember that when we
defined Editor Model metrics we started from the highest possible level of
aggregation (i.e. all namespaces combined, archive table included). See
rationale below from a previous email exchange:
we tried to stick to two
+1
We should always be careful about baking assumptions of EnWIki origin into
metrics and tools that are intended for use across our projects.
- J
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Dario Taraborelli <
dtarabore...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> to add some context to the present approach, you may rememb
