I know 3g will not work with At&t since the G1 does not support the band
frequency AT&T uses.
But you should still be able to get data via EDGE (2g).
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:04 PM, bparker wrote:
>
> Thanks for the link Al, but I have already tried those settings about
> a dozen times. AT&T wi
If they are shipping internationally to other counties, I don't see why not
ship it to New Zealand.
Not sure if the phone will work there, depends if its band frequencies match
up with your carriers.
Hopefully a Google staff member can clear this up.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Izard <[EMAIL P
nly GSM. Where was that specified?
>
>
> --- On Mon, 12/8/08, Josh Roesslein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Josh Roesslein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [android-developers] Re: New SDK Available
> > To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
> > Date: Mon
Sprint uses cdma in most of its coverage areas. Since the g1 is a GSM phone
it probably will not work.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, don rhummy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well any phone works with sprint you will just have to pay
> > more if it
> > is not a sprint phone.
>
> Wait, I thoug
Adding an one app mandatory submission requirement will only result in a
surge of untested, low quality apps flooding the app store.
I'm sure there will be enough dev phones to go around. If not then its the
good old first come first served. :)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PRO
It would take a good deal of work to make android accessible from the web.
Maybe demoing the application by a screen cast would work better.
Then upload that screen cast onto your website for users to watch.
Just an idea.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Ralf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu
Doesn't shock me that the emulator would run faster. Any modern desktop cpu
will smoke any embedded device.
Also keep in mind this isn't really a true emulator. Its more like build of
Android for the x86 processor instead of the ARM in the G1.
So there isn't really any extra overhead involved betwe
I'm pretty sure the G1 is locked to work only on the T-mobile network.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Pulkit Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the question, perhaps, still remains UN-Answered :-(Is the G1 which
> sells for $399 Unlocked to any carrier ???
> And now, as the point is raised
I believe the $179 is the price if you sign the 2 yr contract.
If you don't plan on keeping the 2yr contract it's probably going to cost
you more
to terminate the contract then it would to just pay the full $399.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Pulkit Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Read this --> http://source.android.com/known-issues
It's a known issue. Follow those steps listed there. Fixed the issue for me.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Glad the source has been released.
>
> I can't get repo to pull down webkit. Everything else se
This news just made today a good day for me. :)
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Timbobsteve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Congratulations to the Android Development team, Google Employees and
> the entire OpenSource community. Today is a great day for developers who
> enjoy freedom and developi
First make sure you have Java installed on your machine. You'll need the JDK
(Java Developer Kit).
JDK 6 Update 7 will work fine. You can try the Update 10 RC version (beta),
but it's not really need for Android.
http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp
Next download a copy of Eclipse and i
Thanks alot! That seems to work just fine.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Xolotl Loki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > Anyone have any experience with pop ups?
> > I'll keep playing with it and if I figure it out I'll be sure to share
> > it h
Anyone have any experience with pop ups?
I'll keep playing with it and if I figure it out I'll be sure to share it
here for future developers.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:46 PM, JoshTheCoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to display a pop window over the current displayed view.
> For som
I think you should be fine with a persistent connection. It might affect the
battery life a bit, but if you need live data then its really your only
option.
Only issue you might have is the connection getting dropped due to signal
lose or maybe when the phone switches cells (not sure if the network
erialization there. You can somewhat mitigate slow startup times
> here by caching data in your process, using the Activity APIs to
> transfer state across instances, etc... but best is to just design
> your app up-front to have a fast startup time, benefiting many
> important inter
time (you really want to keep it < 1 second) then
> they are much less likely to use your app.
>
> On Oct 7, 3:33 pm, "Josh Roesslein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah I'm not sure how the performance of serialization is on the Dalvik
> VM.
> > If y
Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:17 PM, hackbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It does support it, but I would generally recommend against it because
> Java serialization is slow.
>
> It's hard to address the original question because there are basically
> no details.
>
>
I believe Android's Java VM fully supports Java Serialization.
Trying Googling for "java serialization" and you should find plenty of
tutorials
to get you started.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Nemat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me about object serialization in Android
I'm running 32bit Ubuntu 8.4 and have had no issues so far with running the
emulator.
Maybe its an issue with the 64bit version or hardware related. Sorry I can't
help you anymore. :(
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jeffrey Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
> I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu 8.4
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
