Looks like he's at it again:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!msg/android-developers/Wos0Zu0IdFM/N0ua3NAgzk4J
,
this time he answers a question by telling the poster to do what they've
already done in the code sample they included. What bothers me is that it
seems like he doesn't actua
he...but dont know if it is well used:
>
> l.setDrawingCacheEnabled(true)**;
>
> Bitmap bmp = l.getDrawingCache();
>
> this bmp is null...
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:07 AM, a1 wrote:
> W dniu niedziela, 27 stycznia 2013 04:04:22 UTC+1 użytkownik Justin Buser
> napisał:
&
> On Sunday, January 27, 2013 2:31:21 AM UTC, Justin Buser wrote:
>
>> Who should Google who's name?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Piren wrote:
>>
>>> Holy fuck dude... you should really google his name...
>>>
>>>
nfinitely
> more familiar with how the code actually works than you are.
> Perhaps instead of "correcting" Romain, you could go over to a linux
> kernel mailing list and correct Linus Torvalds in his observations on the
> linux kernel.
>
>
> On Sunday, January 6, 201
Who should Google who's name?
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Piren wrote:
> Holy fuck dude... you should really google his name...
>
>
> On Saturday, November 17, 2012 10:18:27 PM UTC+2, Justin Buser wrote:
>>
>> I don't understand why I keep finding diffe
lps answer questions to share from his depth of knowledge, so if you
factually disagree be to the point and show where he erred, without the
attacks.
On Nov 17, 2012 3:19 PM, "Justin Buser" wrote:
I don't understand why I keep finding different posts by you about forcing
layout passes
I don't understand why I keep finding different posts by you
about forcing layout passes. The View instance this person is referring
would never go through a layout pass, regardless of the point at which his
code was executed for several reasons, most notably because it's never even
added to
You'd really have to provide some relevant information, telling us the
sigspec and what your apps pid happened to be when it died is not really
enough to go on.
On Friday, April 20, 2012 3:44:40 AM UTC-4, B.Arunkumar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have designed an app which renders video from IP cam
I'm having trouble understanding the gradientRadius attribute also, it
would seem based on the documentation that a value of 50.0% would result in
an evenly balanced radius but any % value I enter (from 0.1% to 99.9%)
results in the android:endColor being the only visible color. Does anyone
hav
Some screen shots/more information would be helpful, have you tried
signing manually from the command line using keytool/jarsigner?
On Jan 15, 12:13 am, PFP Dev wrote:
> Not sure if this is the place to be asking this, I have tried many
> places with no answer.
>
> I am recently trying export my
So if I am correct you are saying that you want the video to be
landscape and the player controls to be portrait while the phone is
portrait oriented?
On Jan 7, 12:41 am, Darshan wrote:
> My app's requirement is that it should display the Video in Landscape
> mode only even when the device's orie
If you just need to alter the AndroidManifest.xml file and add
additional classes then the answer is yes. As an example I have an app
in the market (air.com.justinbuser.BuzeyTunes) that was built under
similar circumstances. Being as it's an Adobe Air application built
using Flash Builder Burrito t
12 matches
Mail list logo
