As per its
docshttp://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/SharedPreferences.html#getAll%28%29:
Note that you must not modify the collection returned by this method, or
alter any of its contents. The consistency of your stored data is not
guaranteed if you do.
Is there a
setAccuracyhttp://developer.android.com/reference/android/location/Criteria.html#setAccuracy%28int%29
Indicates the desired accuracy for latitude and longitude. Accuracy may
be ACCURACY_FINE if desired location is fine, else it can be
ACCURACY_COARSE. More accurate location may consume more
The preferences are apparently *cleared *when one tries to load them when
there is a null key which is bad ! Reproducer :
public class XmlExceptionTest extends AndroidTestCase {
/** Run it twice - on the second run the exception is thrown */
public void testXmlException() {
after shutting down device or killing
the app - Stack Overflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9803838/shared-preferences-get-lost-after-shutting-down-device-or-killing-the-app#comment12495021_9803838
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:48:12 AM UTC-5, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
The preferences
at him for providing a guess at something he didn't
even write.
kris
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Palmer Eldritch
the@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 7:44:17 PM UTC+2, Nobu Games wrote:
I quickly peeked into the source code and well
action by Android devs, if none of them respond here.
Kris
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Palmer Eldritch
the@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I did not mean to complain at Nobu - sorry if I sounded harsh :)
I just wanted to point out that my question was not so much what happens
?
No
Receiving an object one hasn't the slightest idea about is apparently the
android way - may be null or not - who cares as long as we can add an if
Even in one of the most fundamental callbacks
Maybe have a look at my links after all ?
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 3:46:41 PM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote
you're supposed to receive an
object.
On Thursday, July 11, 2013 6:01:13 AM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
I suspect it can't be null *by construction* - I just can't pin it down
in code (or in docs)
It's nice to be sure
Can somebody point to the relevant code parts ?
I mean what paths lead
/ActivityThread.java#2335
On Thursday, July 11, 2013 4:09:27 PM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
That's nice advice - but in this case I think one should have a guarantee
Does it make sense to receive a null intent ? Is it even possible with
the current android code ?
On Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:46:00
I mean nobody knows ??
Do you ever check the intent for being null and if not why ?
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 3:46:41 PM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
In other words :
@Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
final String action = intent.getAction
:18:09 AM UTC+3, TreKing wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Palmer Eldritch
the@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I mean nobody knows ??
Do you ever check the intent for being null and if not why ?
Here's what you do. Assume it will not be null, then use ACRA or some
other bug
In other words :
@Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
final String action = intent.getAction(); // can intent==null here ?
}
I need to solve this once and for all so please no ifs and buts. I would
check for null but I suspect that it is not
define permission for the broadcaster since that broadcast is a
system broadcast...
On Monday, May 6, 2013 1:13:27 AM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
What confuses me really is that I request a permission for _receiving_ a
particular intent (whose action is boot_completed) - I do not define
any permissions for it.
On Saturday, May 4, 2013 3:47:06 PM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
Still interested in this
1. Why there is no warning :
receiver !-- no warning --
android:name=.receivers.TriggerMonitoringBootReceiver
android:enabled=false
intent
from - it's not a quick test
Also, considering this is only a warning, you're giving it way too much
emphasis.
I disagree - I do pay attention to warnings - I want none :)
On Sunday, May 5, 2013 6:29:52 PM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
Did you read the question ?
If Exported
android.intent.action.QUICKBOOT_POWERON (another tip ;-)) and don't
forget you need the app to run at least once before (yet another tip :-D)
If you want 0 warnings, tell the compiler to stop showing them :)
On Sunday, May 5, 2013 11:07:12 PM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
On Sunday, May 5, 2013 6
is not displayed ? Which intents fall into this category ?
Thanks :)
On Saturday, April 20, 2013 3:44:52 PM UTC+3, Palmer Eldritch wrote:
I have the following receivers declared :
pre
receiver !-- no warning --
android:name=.receivers.TriggerMonitoringBootReceiver
Excuse me I am facing a similar issue with my (twice posted) Exported
receiver does not require permission
Is some human moderating the forums or some machine - which obviously fails
?
Please amend this situation - it is very frustrating - and no, I am no n00b
- these are no SO questions -
18 matches
Mail list logo
