ok thanks for other the lists I will move there, just confusing this
list is named "android-developers" not android-developers-sdk
then bot point me an insult?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Kristopher Micinski
wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:49 PM, mm w <0xcafef...@
is totally unacceptable surely.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Kristopher Micinski
wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:39 PM, mm w <0xcafef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> As it is indexed publicly, I think you'll find that your email will
>>> frequently appear highly
> As it is indexed publicly, I think you'll find that your email will
> frequently appear highly when googled for..
and ? I have nothing to hide, I asked questions about C
implementations and did not want any answer about java, not my
concern, then you are a stubborn boy, trying to sell me I shoul
your view, not employee anyway
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroup
entation within Android, you access these using File / java.io.*
> classes.
>
> Kris
>
by this time I did implement all my file-io-directory operations using
userspace fs linux-android APIs.
I can talk and work 8-)
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:09 PM, mm w <0xcafef...@gmail.com>
at 12:01 PM, mm w <0xcafef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> yep we like anti pattern 8-) how many different kinds of animals are there?
>
> If you're not developing with the Android SDK -- which is java based
> -- then your post is off topic for this list.
>
> kris
>
> -
and @lew in your kido-preteen-troll (BTW you made LOL with your naming
convention) you omitted this line on purpose:
throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage());
if you want to troll do it with your kids, at least they will take you
seriously.
8-)
--
You received this message because you are su
> No prefix "m" is necessary, although for some reason many
> people do that, and underscores are not conventional. Use
> camel case, as 'mInstance' (if you must use the wart), or just
> 'instance'.
I do disagree
m_instance means private, just a c++ old fart convention anyway I
never use public v
2012 at 10:28 AM, mm w <0xcafef...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as I can see, using the static container call, I did not get
> any downsides , sure we are right in our mind and not trying to do
> inappropriate behaviors with a singleton pattern, things you described
> into your ar
As far as I can see, using the static container call, I did not get
any downsides , sure we are right in our mind and not trying to do
inappropriate behaviors with a singleton pattern, things you described
into your article which mostly just appoints strange practices which
never pop'ed in right mi
yep we like anti pattern 8-) how many different kinds of animals are there?
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Kristopher Micinski
wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:22 PM, 0xcafef...@gmail.com
> <0xcafef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> is there any layer/API to access Android filesystem? (C, don't give a
>>
thanks
I do a lot... but no doc, there is an asset-manager header which looks
like totally immature (kind of my first c++ class) and undocumented
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Justin Anderson wrote:
> You could look at the NDK...
>
> Thanks,
> Justin Anderson
> MagouyaWare Developer
> http://s
> What if the constructor could throw a genuine exception (say file not found)
it would be per see a bad design, a singleton implementation follows
some mind designs,
> or you wanted to supply some non-static arguments to it?
if what you do, does not fit with a singleton pattern don't or use a
google could by just crypting and signing the binaries maybe in ten years
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Adam Ratana wrote:
> To add to this:
>
> I've seen some apps I've made get cracked and posted on various sites, but
> the ones that had true appeal (imo) continue to sell regardless. General
14 matches
Mail list logo
