[android-developers] Re: Android Market :: Free application gets to top of pile on new release, paid app doesn't?

2009-07-07 Thread Rob Franz
Ah sorry, I was talking about in the "By Date" view... which appears to be broken. 2009/7/7 Cédric Berger > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 02:19, Rob Franz wrote: > > Say I have two apps - one free, one paid. > > > > I release updates to both. The free one is at the top of the list, > > but the paid

[android-developers] Re: Android Market :: Free application gets to top of pile on new release, paid app doesn't?

2009-07-07 Thread Rob Franz
The way I've been doing it - I release them at the same time, so there's maybe 1-2 minutes between uploads. So I doubt that there's 30 other apps (in the same order everytime) that are released. On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:00 AM, ad wrote: > > I'm guessing there was a longer period between releases

[android-developers] Re: Android Market :: Free application gets to top of pile on new release, paid app doesn't?

2009-07-07 Thread ad
I'm guessing there was a longer period between releases on the free one - maybe thats why it went to the top? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send emai

[android-developers] Re: Android Market :: Free application gets to top of pile on new release, paid app doesn't?

2009-07-07 Thread Rob Franz
It never used to be like that though - when you uploaded two of them, you'd see both of the right at the top of the column. Didn't have to do with popularity... 2009/7/7 Cédric Berger > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 02:19, Rob Franz wrote: > > Say I have two apps - one free, one paid. > > > > I rel

[android-developers] Re: Android Market :: Free application gets to top of pile on new release, paid app doesn't?

2009-07-07 Thread Cédric Berger
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 02:19, Rob Franz wrote: > Say I have two apps - one free, one paid. > > I release updates to both.  The free one is at the top of the list, > but the paid one is down in the depths of the list.  That kind of > sucks. > > Is this really how it works?  Or is something tempora