I am not a Google employee but I hope you don't mind if I chime in
In the Developer Distribution Agreement it says
3.3 You may also choose to distribute Products for free. If the
Product is free, you will not be charged a Transaction Fee. You may
not collect future charges from users for copies
How about charging for the apps using a "service model"
You could name you apps like
com.foobar.theapp2009q1
com.foobar.theapp2009q2
com.foobar.theapp2009q3 com.foobar.theapp2009q4
When version X expires, the app can launch an Intent to point the user to
the newer version. This way it should b
Oh.. Are we going to be able to do subscriptions like that? I was
only aware of a one-time fee for app licenses.
On Feb 12, 12:36 pm, Mattaku Betsujin
wrote:
> How about charging for the apps using a "service model"
>
> You could name you apps like
>
> com.foobar.theapp2009q1
> com.foobar.thea
I don't see any clause in the Developer Distribution Agreement against
subscriptions. Especially, in this case, the user is buying 4 apps with
different package names (one for each quarter of the year). As far as the
market is concerned, there are 4 different apps.
I think the carrier will just be
4 matches
Mail list logo
