On Feb 11, 7:53 am, Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would hope that main apps can't reach inside other apps to access
their code! In any case, even if you got an app's bytecode, there's
not really a way to take arbitrary bytecode and execute it on the vm.
Though I think
Note that the thread you cite was from early beta versions of Android
in the spring of 2008.
That's not to say that the technique doesn't work, but unless you've
actually implemented it, I would take such an old thread with a
decent-sized grain of salt.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Doug
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Doug beafd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 7:53 am, Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would hope that main apps can't reach inside other apps to access
their code! In any case, even if you got an app's bytecode, there's
not really a way to
Yes, the flags have scary names as a warning, but using them with
createPackageContext definitely does work (is 4.0.2 recent enough?)
13 февраля 2012 г. 17:19 пользователь Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com написал:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Doug beafd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb
2012/2/13 Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.com:
Yes, the flags have scary names as a warning, but using them with
createPackageContext definitely does work (is 4.0.2 recent enough?)
That's not my point... My point is that I feel people are very prone
to use this when they really shouldn't be.
Oh, I agree that using those is most likely a bad idea.
But, for the record, even though the technique is described in a
thread from 2008, it still works today.
-- Kostya
13 февраля 2012 г. 17:41 пользователь Kristopher Micinski
krismicin...@gmail.com написал:
2012/2/13 Kostya Vasilyev
Something more recent posted by Fred Chung, Android Developer
Advocate:
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2011/07/custom-class-loading-in-dalvik.html
On Feb 13, 5:48 am, Kostya Vasilyev kmans...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, I agree that using those is most likely a bad idea.
But, for the
On Feb 9, 1:35 pm, New Developer secur...@isscp.com wrote:
For further insight, under windows I used a code within the .exe which
said which modules were available
then based on the code it checked to see if those .dll were present. If
so, then they were loaded and added
items to the main
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Doug beafd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 1:35 pm, New Developer secur...@isscp.com wrote:
For further insight, under windows I used a code within the .exe which
said which modules were available
then based on the code it checked to see if those .dll were
deep in the system, you also have shared objects, which can be like
dlls. for java though, it is the jars
On Feb 9, 9:49 am, Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:42 PM, New Developer secur...@isscp.com wrote:
In Windows programming we have DLL so that
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:54 PM, JackN j...@jacknorth.com wrote:
deep in the system, you also have shared objects, which can be like
dlls. for java though, it is the jars
Right, but by that argument you could also have a shared object for the ndk
that you'd migrate to the android platform.
11 matches
Mail list logo
