Thanks for your reminder, Mark. I posted this there, but seems no one
has such a requirement.
On Dec 4, 12:32 pm, "Mark Murphy" wrote:
> > No one met such problems?
>
> > Currently, I have to make some change to the package.mk,
> > definitions.mk and base_rules.mk to generate the result as expect
> No one met such problems?
>
> Currently, I have to make some change to the package.mk,
> definitions.mk and base_rules.mk to generate the result as expected.
> But I'm afraid this is not the best solution for it might have
> systematic impact.
The SDK does not have Android.mk. Your question prob
No one met such problems?
Currently, I have to make some change to the package.mk,
definitions.mk and base_rules.mk to generate the result as expected.
But I'm afraid this is not the best solution for it might have
systematic impact.
On Dec 2, 5:33 pm, nowingfly wrote:
> Can anyone help?
>
> On
Can anyone help?
On Dec 2, 4:04 pm, nowingfly wrote:
> BTW, my Android.mk is:
>
> LOCAL_PATH := $(call my-dir)
> include $(CLEAR_VARS)
>
> LOCAL_MODULE_TAGS := user development
>
> LOCAL_STATIC_JAVA_LIBRARIES := servletlib
>
> LOCAL_SRC_FIL
BTW, my Android.mk is:
LOCAL_PATH := $(call my-dir)
include $(CLEAR_VARS)
LOCAL_MODULE_TAGS := user development
LOCAL_STATIC_JAVA_LIBRARIES := servletlib
LOCAL_SRC_FILES := $(call all-subdir-java-files)
LOCAL_PACKAGE_NAME := MyApp
includ
5 matches
Mail list logo